Trump told Israelis what they want to hear. But Trump is undeterred from his goal of Israeli-Palestinian peace, and unlike Netanyahu, believes both sides are ready to make history

Haaretz

In one of the low points in American-Israeli relations during Barack Obama’s first term, Michael Oren approached one of the U.S. president’s senior advisers. “Try love,” the Israeli ambassador to the United States told the senior White House official. “You’ve tried exerting pressure and criticizing the Israeli government; try love, too. You’ll see that it works better.”

During his speech at the Israel Museum on Tuesday, U.S. President Donald Trump took Oren’s suggestion to the extreme. Trump didn’t just try love, he showered it everywhere. It was boundless; it was intoxicating. Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman, who sat in the front row, would certainly tag this speech “Paradise-plus-plus.”

Trump gave Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, his cabinet ministers and the Israeli public watching at home what most Israeli Jews love to hear. He spoke about the Jewish people’s millennia-old link to the Land of Israel and to Jerusalem; he spoke about persecution, pogroms and the Holocaust, but also about rebirth, making the desert bloom and Israel’s economic success.

Trump presented Israel the way most Israelis like to think of it — smart, good and in the right, without criticism, buts or maybes. Without condemnation of construction in the settlement, without heartrending stories about the undermining of Palestinian civil rights in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, without mention of a Palestinian state or the two-state solution. Trump integrated into his speech some excerpts from the pantheon of Israeli public diplomacy, speaking about the preservation of minority rights, freedom of worship for Muslims and Christians and so on.
After a warm-up from Netanyahu — who, predictably, portrayed Trump as following in the path of President Harry Truman, who recognized the State of Israel seven minutes after independence was declared — Trump proceeded to depict himself as the best friend Israel ever had or will ever have. He didn’t miss the opportunity to insert some alternative facts into his speech, like taking credit for the Iron Dome anti-rocket system and for supplying the F-35 fighter jets and upgrading U.S. military aid to Israel — all of which took place during Obama’s tenure. At a certain point he said, “Iran’s leaders routinely call for Israel’s destruction. Not with Donald J. Trump,” he added dramatically, generating a standing ovation.

Trump’s speech was a positive end to a very positive visit as far as Netanyahu was concerned. After eight lean years of the Obama era, the prime minister enjoyed every minute of Trump’s 27 hours in Israel, during which the two acted like the perfect couple. In terms of the diplomatic statements, Netanyahu could be satisfied by Trump’s tough declarations on Iran, by Trump’s call to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to have zero tolerance for violence, to condemn terror and to stop funding or rewarding terrorists, by the fact that despite earlier promises, he refrained from declaring support for Palestinian self-determination.

On the other hand, there were other parts that were less pleasing to Netanyahu and the ministers of this right-wing government. Not only did Trump not announce that the U.S. embassy would be moving from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, throughout his visit he avoided making any reference at all to Israeli sovereignty in the capital. Trump related to Jerusalem and the holy places almost as if it was an extraterritorial area, where only God is sovereign.

Other issues Netanyahu should be worried about are the close ties that have apparently developed between Trump and the leaders of the Sunni Muslim states, first and foremost King Salman of Saudi Arabia, and even more so the fact that the U.S. president has adopted the Palestinian and Arab narrative which makes the occupation that started in 1967 one of the roots of the Middle East’s problems. Trump directly linked the resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict to the eradication of the Islamic State group and of Al-Qaida, and said that an Israeli-Palestinian agreement could launch a peace process throughout the Middle East. There is nothing Netanyahu despises more than this argument, but since this was Trump, he restrained himself and remained silent.

The hugs and kisses that Trump scattered everywhere in his Jerusalem speech did not distract him from the message he’d been hammering home from the moment he landed at Ben-Gurion International Airport. Trump wants a deal between Israel and the Palestinians, and thinks that achieving such a deal will be difficult but not impossible. In contrast to what the two leaders themselves think, Trump believes that both Netanyahu and Abbas are ripe for making history.

As of now, Trump has no plan, but he’s determined to try and determined to succeed, and fast. The bottom line of the Trump’s charm offensive at the Israel Museum is that the Israeli government and the Palestinian leadership are approaching the moment when they’ll have to make tough decisions and painful concessions.

4 thoughts on “Trump's Israel Love Offensive Might Carry a Hefty Price Tag”
  1. i suspect that the Frump HRC would have recv’d a Bat Mitmitzva and more / aimed all talk at destroying Iran ~ she could care less about peace or 2 state or any state other than her domination of the world.

  2. “Not only did Trump not announce that the U.S. embassy would be moving from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, throughout his visit he avoided making any reference at all to Israeli sovereignty in the capital.”
    Well that offers some small hope to humanity at least. Some SMALL hope. Should Jerusalem become Jewtown, then the future looks bleak indeed for all civilized individuals across the planet. I say ‘individuals’ rather than ‘countries’ because all the countries of the Zest at least, have proven themselves to be utterly uncivilized where it comes to the Palestinian issue, and utter traitors to their OWN people.
    “He spoke about the Jewish people’s millennia-old link to the Land of Israel and to Jerusalem; he spoke about persecution, pogroms and the Holocaust, but also about rebirth, making the desert bloom and Israel’s economic success.”
    Soapin’ ‘em up alright. Pandering to their grandiose sense of collective history and, of course, collective victimhood. And of course, their ‘millennia-old link to the Land’ … even though so many of them have turned white during their long exodus. White-skinned … but still black-hearted.
    Tell ya one thing that is blooming in the Israeli desert … databases. Hyep. While US heavy industry has been ‘offshored’ to China – at US taxpayer expense – Siliconian Valley is being ‘offshored’ to little old Irahell. They call it ‘Silicon Wadi’ .. https://www.forbes.com/sites/theyec/2013/10/02/for-real-innovation-its-not-silicon-valley-but-silicon-wadi/#1556cb8a25e2
    Yes, it’s Irael that now controls the world’s data flows … and ‘security’. And they’re a-militarizin’ the hitech as fast as their little Talmudic legs can carry them … http://jewishweek.timesofisrael.com/talpiot-the-idfs-best-and-brightest/.
    Of course, with an unlimited budget, it’s easy.
    Meantime … “Trump wants a deal between Israel and the Palestinians, and thinks that achieving such a deal will be difficult but not impossible.”
    And pigs can fly too.

  3. Did you ever wonder if perhaps Trump wanted to promote peace for Palestine and Israel, just to keep Israel safe?
    ed note–yes, that is possible, but it is also somewhere between possible and PROBABLE that the patience on the part of the US & others for the entire ‘Jewish state’ project has finally come to an end and saner players are out to get this out of control situation back into control before the entire world blows up.
    Besides, peace in the region means the death of Israel, did you ever wonder if perhaps this is what the final intended product is?

  4. Unless Trump has a few things up his sleeve, i don’t see how any peace deal would be permanent. The Jews may feel temporarily cornered into ‘negotiations’, but short of another Masada episode, I don’t think it would ever last. It’s not in their tribal make-up to be at peace with anyone or anything. They’ll pretend to talk/negotiate; they may even sign some type of accord, if they think they can easily weasel their way out of it in future. But I can’t see any stolen land ever being given up. They’ll scorch it (or us) before they’ll allow that — UNLESS the United States has their own Samson Option.
    And I agree with James Benn–the Jews have major abilities in technology & security.
    https://www.breakingisraelnews.com/63161/blogs-biblical-roots-idfs-most-elite-military-unit/#btW2iWzmM0F5yvK6.97
    “In the IDF unit Talpiot, soldiers are of course taught to fight, but the priority is to relearn how to think. The end goal is to turn young soldiers into research and development machines that are capable of developing the weapons and intelligence tools of the future. They are expected to put Israeli defense a generation ahead of the Jewish State’s enemies and to also stay ahead of the super-powers including the United States. The U.S., China, and Russia supply Israel’s enemies with technology and advanced weapons. If Israel doesn’t keep pace or get ahead, it is in danger.”
    This review of “Israel’s Edge – The Story of Israel’s Most Elite Unit -Talpiot” by Jason Gewirtz is interesting. The review is by Aaron Leible, an admitted Zionist who states Gewirtz’ “Zionist pride…is a little too evident.” Who is Gewirtz? He’s a producer at CNBC.
    http://washingtonjewishweek.com/32408/true-stories-of-israeli-achievements-maybe/arts/arts_features/books/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Discover more from The Ugly Truth

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading