ed note–and yes, once again, time to throw down the ‘we told ya so’ card, ladies and Gentile-men.
Almost a decade ago, when yours truly, the greatly-missed Mike Piper and a HANDFUL of others were warning about the ticking time bomb known as the ‘Sandy Hook Never Happened’ psyop that would have DIRE consequences if it were not nipped in the bud, yours truly, the greatly-missed Mike Piper and the HANDFUL of others who made it their business to voice LOUDLY AND REGULARLY these warnings were ignored, ridiculed, marginalized and accused of being ‘ZYNISS agents’ who were being paid mountains of cash to discredit the otherwise unquestionable character/intellectual giftedness of creatures such as Jim Fetzer, Gordon Duff, Alex Jones, John Friend and others who had been hand-picked by Cass Sunstein and Judea, Inc to be the couriers of this poison that by its very design, would FOREVER destroy the credibility of any and all persons advancing ‘alternative’ theories/ideas for many of the tectonic political events taking place then, now, and in the future.
We can only imagine now, in the aftermath of the disaster that has recently taken place viz the 2020 elections and the installation of a Biden Presidency that will GLADLY hand Israel EVERY SINGLE WAR SHE DEMANDS the degree to which the ‘Sandy Hook Never Happened’ fiasco has contributed to this disaster and how it could have been mitigated if common sense had just prevailed over willful stupidity.
Austin American-Statesman
The Texas Supreme Court on Friday rejected, without comment, conspiracy theorist Alex Jones’ attempt to toss out four defamation lawsuits by parents of children killed at Sandy Hook Elementary in 2012.
The parents sued in Travis County, where Jones and his InfoWars website are based, arguing that they were defamed and suffered emotional distress after InfoWars broadcasts disputed the authenticity of the school shooting and the news coverage that followed.
Parents leave a staging area after being reunited with their children following a shooting at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., about 60 miles (96 kilometers) northeast of New York City, Friday, Dec. 14, 2012. An official with knowledge of Friday’s shooting said 27 people were dead, including 18 children. It was the worst school shooting in the country’s history. (AP Photo/Jessica Hill)
Twenty young students and six adults were shot and killed at the Sandy Hook school in Newtown, Conn.
Friday’s action by the Supreme Court upheld rulings by two lower courts that had allowed the lawsuits to continue.
The state’s highest civil court also gave the green light to another defamation lawsuit against InfoWars and reporter Kit Daniels by a man mistakenly identified as a suspect in the 2018 shooting at a high school in Parkland, Fla.
The photo of Marcel Fontaine, who was not the shooter, remained on the InfoWars website for 13 hours, and no correction was issued at the time explaining the mistaken identification, court records show.
Friday’s Sandy Hook rulings will allow four lawsuits to proceed:
• Neil Heslin, father of 6-year-old Jesse Lewis, filed two lawsuits taking exception to statements by Jones alleging that the school shooting at Sandy Hook was “a giant hoax” and disputing Heslin’s claim that he had held his dead son in his arms afterward.
• The lawsuit by Scarlett Lewis, mother of Jesse Lewis, noted statements by Jones that the school shooting was “as phony as a three-dollar bill” as well as other statements on InfoWars implying that parents were not genuinely grieving the loss of their children.
• Leonard Pozner and Veronique De La Rosa, parents of 6-year-old Noah Pozner, quoted broadcasts in which Jones cast the school shooting as a “false flag” hoax intended to create a pretext for the government to limit gun rights.
Friday’s announcement by the Supreme Court noted that two members, Justices Jeff Boyd and John Devine, would have granted Jones’ petition for review in the Pozner lawsuit, but the court order provided no reasons for their dissent.
In briefs to the Supreme Court, lawyers for Jones argued that the InfoWars host was engaging in protected speech because he was addressing matters of public concern.
“The pursuit of so-called ‘conspiracy theories’ concerning controversial government activities has been a part and parcel of American political discourse since our Founding, and it is protected by the First Amendment,” they told the court in a brief for the Pozner and De La Rosa case.
Jones also argued that state libel laws required any harmful speech to be directed at specific family members, but the Sandy Hook families were not named in three InfoWars reports in 2017.
But a lawyer for the Sandy Hook families argued that Jones didn’t merely say the school shooting was staged by the government, he also generally accused family members of being actors to help sell the coverup and exploit the event to attack gun rights.
As a result, Jones and InfoWars accused family members of collusion in a hoax “relating to the murder of their son … for nefarious purposes,” lawyer Mark Bankston told the court.
Jones was also reckless in publishing information that was so improbable that no reasonable publisher would have done likewise wtihout substantial confirmation, Bankston argued.
“Mr. Jones’ fantasy about a shadowy government conspiracy to murder first-graders and then exploit the event with the help of the media and actors is the very definition of ‘improbable,'” he wrote.
Bankston welcomed the court’s action Friday. “We are pleased Mr. Jones is learning that his frivolous efforts to delay this case will not spare him from the reckoning to come,” he said.
Lawyers for Jones have not responded to a request for comment.