By his recent agreements with Qatar and Turkey and his expanding financial relations with Saudi Arabia, Trump makes it clear that maintaining Israel’s ‘qualitative edge’ will no longer be Washington’s top regional priority.
ed note–as always, lots of ‘must knows’ that every war-weary Gentile with a vested interest in his/her own future survival needs to understand about all of this.
Firsto, ladies and Gentile-men, which is the obvious, i.e. that the Jews, and especially those aligned with the warlord Beelzu-Bibi Netanyahu, are not in the least bit pleased with what has been imposed upon them by the President of the United States, Donald J. Trump.
Oct. 7th and the Genocide of Gentiles that began on that day was/is all part of a plan 3,000 years along in its development aimed at setting the entire planet on fire as the necessary precursor to the Jews declaring their terrorist Jewish state as the headquarters of the same ‘New World Order’ that they believe they are commanded to construct per the ‘protocols’ of their Torah Judah-ism.
All of this being the case, we’re going to repeat it again, ladies and Gentile-men, for the benefit of those who suffer either from problems related to short-term memory loss or some sort of attention deficit disorder, no offense intended to those who actually do–
POTUS DJT IMPOSING THE ‘CEASE-FIRE/PEACE DEAL’ UPON THE TERRORIST JEWS AND THEIR TERRORIST JEWISH STATE WAS NOT THE RESULT OF HIM ‘DOING WHAT HE WAS ORDERED TO DO BY HIS ‘MASTER’, BENJAMIN NETANYAHU’…
We are forced to state this fact in the most elementary, basic, and embarassingly-remedial language due to what is (tragically) the tidal wave of irrationality that pervades much of the discussions these days within those circles whose declared ‘expert-cy’ is Israel, the Middle East, and American foreign policy. Within these ‘circles’, various self-proclaimed ‘seers’ lead their readership/listenership/viewership down the road to Disasterville by concocting and propagating the disconnected-from-reality narrative that the POTUS is a mere ‘puppet’ and slave to the forces of organized international Jewry and that he actually wants to assist them in their plans for WWIII/Armageddon.
As should be obvious to those paying closer attention to all of this than what comes by way of viewing all of this through the most simplistic and monoscopic lens, none of this, i.e. the notion that DJT is out to facilitate the same WWIII/Armageddon which the Jews want, bears any connection to the reality of it all.
The REALITY of it, fellow Gentiles, is that the Jews are furious that they have been forced by the POTUS to cease and desist in the feeding frenzy that they began on Oct. 7th.
The piece below, appearing in one of the most pro-Netanyahu/pro-war news outlets in the terrorist Jewish state, is one small piece within that larger puzzle depicting how they, the ‘Children of Israel’, are planning to undermine what it is that the POTUS is trying to achive, not the least of which is preventing the terrorist Jewish state from ‘making good’ on all those commandments demanded by ‘yahweh’, the violent and Genocidal deity that serves as the Commander in Chief of this terrorist enclave, which includes some version of the following–
Israel National News
US President Donald Trump’s proposed peace for Ukraine represents a validation of Russian crimes of war, crimes against peace and crimes against humanity. In essence, Trump’s very conspicuous submission to Vladimir Putin disregards every key principle of modern international law, especially those regarding sovereignty and punishment of aggression. Notwithstanding the codified and authoritative Nuremberg Principles (1950), this continuous submission by Trump declares to the wider world that the most grievous international crimes should be rewarded.
Following such historical examples as Munich in 1938, any forced dismemberment of Ukraine will be just the first step toward future Russian aggressions. These now-impending crimes could extend to assorted NATO states, a perilous extension that would raise the prospects of an uncontrollable nuclear war.
As to the Trump promise of NATO-type collective security for Ukraine, it is unassailably disingenuous. Could any sane observer believe that US President Trump would risk a direct nuclear conflict with Russia on behalf of a victim state for which he has never shown any real regard?
It’s not bewildering. Donald Trump’s ‘peace’ for Ukraine is a contradiction in terms. It calls for that persistently heroic state to accept its own annihilation.
There is more. If you like the American president’s proposal for Ukraine, then you’ll love what he has in store for Israel.
More specifically, by his recent agreements with Qatar and Turkey and his expanding financial relations with Saudi Arabia, Trump makes it clear that maintaining Israel’s ‘qualitative edge’ will no longer be Washington’s top regional priority.
Moreover, incrementally but uncompromisingly, Jerusalem can expect escalating pressures from the Trump administration to accept a Palestinian Arab state. If Israel ultimately agrees to carve a potentially existential adversary from its own still-living body, it will suffer a fate very similar to the one planned for Ukraine. From any such crime-rewarding initiative of an American president, there would be neither escape nor sanctuary.
As can be learned from Trump’s law-violating peace proposals in Europe (Ukraine) and the Middle East (Israel), world peace requires respect for world law. Under modern international rules, system-wide anarchy was confirmed at the Treaty of Westphalia in 1648, but anarchy is now morphing into something much more ominous. With a wink and a nod from the White House, it is becoming chaos.
In Trump’s ‘peace’ between Israel and Hamas, jihadi terrorists are being granted safe haven in Qatar. Guaranteed by the President’s new mutual defense agreement with Doha, jihadi terror criminals can expect immunization from Israeli retaliatory punishments in that Gulf state. Ipso facto, such lawless protections should also be expected by Islamist terrorists operating from Turkey, Syria and Iraq.
These US plans for peace will not help Israel. Although the Islamic Republic is down, it is not out. Among other portents, an already-nuclear enemy state such as North Korea or Pakistan could sometime act as Tehran’s nuclear surrogate. While there is no scientific way to calculate scenario outcomes, there is also nothing to suggest that Israel could survive a nuclear exchange with Pyongyang or Islamabad.
US President Donald Trump has mused openly about nuclear weapons as usable instruments of war, not just as elements of strategic deterrence. Russian President Vladimir Putin has voiced similarly dangerous nuclear musings.
Under Trump’s peace plan for Gaza, no action is contemplated against jihadism in any of its more insidious forms. To wit, even an alleged defeat of Hamas would do nothing to reduce the risk of radiation dispersal weapon attacks by jihadi elements in Sinai, ‘West Bank’ (Judea/Samaria), Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan or Yemen.
Trump’s plan for placing ‘stabilizing’ Arab forces to govern Gaza would heighten the chances of a more widespread regional conflict. Should anyone plausibly expect that terror-supporting Islamic states (both Sunni and Shiite) would actively discourage Gaza deployments of ‘Hamas replacements’? Could anyone reasonably deny that these Trump policies toward Israel are a welcome gift to Vladimir Putin?
There is still more. Various interactions between catastrophic harms could render the risks of regional chaos more urgent. If Jerusalem should at some point have to face a jihadist state adversary with access to nuclear weapons, Israel’s strategic deterrence posture could be fatally undermined. In principle, at least, such a challenge would signify tangible threats of nuclear terrorism and nuclear war.
There are related questions of rationality. In world politics, irrationality is never the same as madness. An irrational adversary could sometime value certain intangible goals even more highly than national self-preservation. A mad adversary, on the other hand, would display no determinable preference ordering of any sort, and thus not be subject to any calculable threats of deterrence. Realistically, for Jerusalem, no analytic choice will be available. Whether Israel would prefer to confront irrationality, madness, or both, will not be Jerusalem’s decision to make.
Since the seventeenth century, our world can best be described as a ‘system.’ What happens in any one part of this world, therefore, will more-or-less affect what happens in some or all other places. When deterioration becomes marked and begins to spread from one country to another, corollary impacts will undermine balance of power infrastructures. When this deterioration becomes rapid and catastrophic, as would likely be the case following the onset of unconventional war or unconventional terrorism, effects would be cascading.
If you like Donald Trump’s planned peace deal for Ukraine, then you’ll love his peace deal for Israel.