Trump chose to appease Arab dictators rather than do what is moral by allowing Israel to proclaim its sovereignty over territory that rightfully belongs to the Jewish people and to the Jewish state.
ed note–another eye-opener that every war-weary Gentile with a vested interest in his/her own future survival needs to read, understand, and take deeply to heart.
Firsto, ladies and Gentile-men, is the obvious, which is that the terrorist Jews, driven as they are by the ‘protocols’ of the terrorist Torah Judah-ism that they follow, are not going to relinquish as much as one micro-ounce of that land which they believe was ‘promised’ to them by the violent, demonic deity they worship, ‘yahweh’, to wit–
‘On that day the LORD made a covenant with Abraham, saying ‘To your descendants I give this land, from the river of Egypt to the great river Euphrates’… Genesis, 15:18
Which means not only Palestine, but as well, half of Egypt, all of Jordan, all of Syria, Lebanon, etc, etc, etc…
And besides the ‘deed’ which they say belongs to them quoted above from the book of Genesis, they have the ‘legal’ mechanism that facilitates their abrogation of whatever ‘agreements’ they are pressured into signing as part of whatever ‘deal’ is done to bring peace to the area, to wit–
‘When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are to possess and drives out the many nations larger and stronger than you, and when the Lord your God has delivered them over to you and you have defeated them, then you must destroy them totally. Make no treaty with them, and show them no mercy. Do not save alive anything that breathes…Do not intermarry with them, for you are a people holy to the Lord your God who has chosen you out of all the peoples on the face of the earth to be his people, his treasured possession…’ –Book of Deuteronomy
But perhaps the most telling part of the essay below, ladies and Gentile-men, is the microscopic view it provides into the inner workings of the devious Jewish brain and the manner in which it is CONSTANTLY conspiring against Gentiles in furthering its aims.
As our diabolically-deranged Judaic essayist lays it out–
‘There is still room for a deal that almost guarantees Israeli sovereignty in Judea and Samaria. In a nutshell, Israel can provisionally accept a Palestinian state provided that the Palestinians fulfill certain conditions within a specified time period, and when they fail to fulfill these conditions, Israel will have the right to annex Judea and Samaria in its entirety…’
Now, without him saying so, what comes as a ‘package deal’ in the Palestinians ‘failing to achieve the conditions’ laid out by Israel is the manner in which the scheming, lying Jews will put various things into motion that PREVENT the Palestinians from achieving those ‘pre-arranged conditions’.
The bottom line, ladies and Gentile-men, is foundationed on 2 basic principles–
1. The Jews are liars and thieves, just as Jesus Christ described them, and are not going to give up on the 3,000-year-old dream they have for ‘Greater Israel’, and what they means is that they will use every ruse and deceptive method at their disposal in getting what they want…
And,
2. That as far as they are concerned, no one, not even the President of the United States, will wake them up from that 3,000-year-old dream and crash-land them back into reality with any ‘peace deals’, and if that means they have to blow up the entire world in order to prevent that aforementioned ‘crash-landing’, then, as the old saying goes, ‘so mote it be’.
Jason Shvili for Israel Hayom
In a previous article appearing here on Hayom, it was argued that Israel should annex Judea and Samaria (the West Bank) in its entirety while the Trump Administration holds power in the US.
This argument was based on the premise that ‘no other US administration, Democrat or Republican, has been more receptive to the idea of Israel extending its sovereignty to Judea and Samaria.’
Unfortunately, I was profoundly wrong.
In fact, last month, Donald Trump’s team went berserk when some Knesset members gave preliminary approval to bills annexing territory in Judea and Samaria, just as US Vice President JD Vance was visiting Israel. Trump’s reasoning behind his firm opposition to annexation is that he ‘promised the Arab states’ that he wouldn’t allow it.
Thus, Trump chose to appease Arab dictators rather than do what’s moral and allow Israel to proclaim its sovereignty over territory that rightfully belongs to the Jewish people and to the Jewish state.
Trump even threatened to cut off all US support if Israel annexed territory.
Inasmuch as Israel is a sovereign country, it cannot afford to lose the support of its most valuable ally.
So, how can Israel stake its rightful claim to Judea and Samaria without risking US support?
The solution lies in President Trump’s agenda to expand the Abraham Accords and persuading more Arab and Muslim countries to normalize relations with Israel. It’s widely believed that the key to convincing other Arab and Muslim states to normalize relations with Israel is Saudi Arabia. Many, if not most, experts believe that once Saudi Arabia normalizes relations with Israel, most other Arab and Muslim countries will follow suit.
But one major roadblock stands in the way of Saudi-Israeli normalization: The Saudis’ insistence on Palestinian statehood, which Israel cannot and must not agree to under current circumstances. Besides, the Palestinians have had plenty of opportunities for statehood – the 1947 UN partition plan, the 2000 Camp David Summit, the 2001 Taba Summit, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert’s offer of statehood in 2008, and what President Trump labelled the ‘Deal of the Century’ in 2020 – all of which the Palestinians rejected. Indeed, the Palestinians have always rejected statehood because their ultimate goal has never been the establishment of a Palestinian state coexisting in peace alongside the Jewish state of Israel. Their ultimate goal has always been the complete destruction of Israel and its replacement with a Palestinian Arab state.
Moreover, there already was a two-state solution. When Israel completely withdrew from the Gaza Strip in 2005, the coastal enclave became a de facto Palestinian state. The Palestinians could have used their newfound autonomy to build the institutions and economy necessary for a prosperous, sovereign country. In fact, they probably could have turned Gaza into the Singapore of the Mediterranean.
But instead, the Palestinians turned Gaza into a terrorist base from which to attack Israel. They launched several wars against Israel, ultimately culminating in the October 7 massacre – the worst mass slaughter of Jews since the Holocaust.
And hence why Saudi Arabia’s demand for Palestinian statehood is a deal-breaker for Israel.
Nevertheless, there is still room for a deal that can satisfy both Israel and Saudi Arabia, and almost guarantees Israeli sovereignty in Judea and Samaria.
In a nutshell, Israel can provisionally accept a Palestinian state in exchange for normalization with the Saudis, provided that the Palestinians fulfill three basic conditions within a specified time period.
These conditions are:
1) The Palestinians must prove they can effectively and democratically govern a country.
2) They must prove they can operate a self-sufficient economy.
And–
3) They must prove their commitment to peace by demilitarizing and reforming their media and education system to eliminate the incitement of hatred and terrorism against Israel and the Jewish people.
The deal would be that if the Palestinians fulfill these three basic conditions within the specified time period, they will be granted statehood.
However, if the Palestinians fail to fulfill these conditions within the specified time period, Israel will have the right to annex Judea and Samaria in its entirety.
Since the Palestinians will almost certainly fail to keep their part of the bargain, just as they failed to fulfill their commitments under the Oslo Accords and other subsequent pacts, this agreement would guarantee Israeli sovereignty over Judea and Samaria.
At the same time, the Saudis will have secured Israel’s promise to accept a Palestinian state.
Later on, when the Palestinians fail to fulfill the conditions for statehood, the Saudis and everyone else who have passionately advocated for the Palestinian cause until now can simply explain that they did all they could to ensure statehood for the Palestinians, but tat the Palestinians blew it.
After the Palestinians fail, once again, for the last time, to seize the opportunity for statehood, no country will have any legitimate reason not to normalize relations with Israel.
I hate to say it, but I blame Christianity for US evangelicals to fall for this insane mindset. Perhaps I need to be more specific by blaming the early Church. I am no theologian, but whoever “decided” to put together the New Testament and the Torah/Old Testament/Jewish Bible should of had their head(s) examined. All that did was allow the possibility for a snake oil salesman to “interpret” for his own self-aggrandizement, a heretics-tongue for leading followers to go BACKWARDS. Its like learning a new recipe-method that VASTLEY improves on the one you used to use, but instead, you keep the old recipe around for reference. Makes no sense.
“Since the Palestinians will almost certainly fail to keep their part of the bargain, just as they failed to fulfil their commitments under the Oslo Accords and other subsequent pacts,”
This destroys your credibility. Netanyahu has openly bragged that he was the one that successfully negated the Oslo Accords.
Any hope of peace died after Rabin was assassinated by one of Netanyahu’s followers.
Why do you people keep banging on about Jesus’s comment on Jews? He was just another Jew who got pissed off with them because they weren’t buying his brand of bullshit. The religion some hellenised types built on him is still selling the same nasty Jewish god.
Ed note–could be wrong, but wethinks that thou art not who/what thou pretendest to be…
With your deflectionary and ‘let’s change the subject from the main thesis in the Jew’s essay to how useless Christianity is’, what the critical Gentile mind is left to conclude is that thou beist a Jew or one of the Jews’ lackeys, who instead of trying to debate the issue at hand, instead plays a game of informational ‘bait and switch’.
Nevertheless, we’ll play along, at least for a minute or so.
Jesus was not selling the same ‘nasty Jewish god’ as you so stupidly put it.
In fact, had He been involved in that business, of ‘selling’ and promoting the ‘nasty’ god of the Jews, He would not have run into the kinds of trouble that He did. In everything He did and in everything He said, what He told those with ears to hear and with brains to think is that they should abandon the ‘nasty’ god of the Jews for ‘God the father’ instead.
The instances in which He did this are too numerous to list here, and the fact that somehow you fail (refuse) to acknowledge this fact tells us that you are one of two things, either–
1. A fool
or–
2.’Not who thou pretendest to be…’
There is only one group of people who benefit from the discussion-switching direction in the fashion that you attempted to accomplish with your comment, which would tell us that you are more thank likely either a tribesman or else one of their gofer lackeys who does their bidding.