7 thoughts on “How Las Vegas gunman turned a rifle into a rapid-fire weapon”
  1. This fester from the main streeme media is there only to confuse us even more about what really happened in Las Vegas. You must be now br certain that it it was not Stephen Paddock who was the gunman. Then who was behind it. Start thinking in Judea Inc. terms.
    ed note–and your proof of this is what? The number of people killed with a fully automatic high powered rifle that fires 600 rounds per minute from an elevated position? You people are playing right into the hands of your enemies–as you correctly noted, ‘Judea, Inc’–by throwing out a bunch of baseless, nonsensical speculation that is rooted in nothing more than your own paranoia and sef-proclaimed political expertise.
    We went through this before already with Sandy Hook, the Boston Marathon Bombing, San Bernardino, etc, etc, etc. All your theories and predictions turned out to be nothing, and yet you continue muddying the waters with your one-dimensional theorizing.
    You people do more damage to our movement than the Jews themselves.

  2. You should be embarrassed with your 600 rounds per SECOND trap . Even a minute researching your FACTS would have avoided this huge mistake . But no you are too busy making up figures to fit your agenda . I bet there is a jew involved here . Oh how about the owners of your site . ??

  3. the only mention I see of 600 rounds is in the comments section and it says per minute, not by per second and if you or anyone else believes that Jews are involved in anything appearing on this website you need to either get your eyes or your head examined.

  4. Some people see a hooknose behind every rock.How about a nut job on psychotropic drugs? A surefire recipe for disaster. Now, a jew doctor prescribing those drugs? Probably

  5. in fact, the weapon which Paddock used coupled with the bump stock fires closer to 900 rounds per minute, not the measly 600

  6. Well what have became of you Glenn. You have yourself mintet the word Judea Inc. , so I use that.
    And then you have said that there isn´t any movements so how could I have damages it?
    First you must realice that the 64-years old Stephen Paddock was´t the shooter.

    ed note-evidence, evidence, evidence. I keep using that word, and yet you are bringing us none.
    What has ‘become’ of me? I use my brain. I think. I reason. I look for pieces of the puzzle and then put them together before deciding what the finished picture is. I had a good teacher in this regard. His name was Mike Piper.

  7. The uploader has not made this video available in your country : is what it says above. I’m in Oz.
    Why 23 mil type rifles ? Why wouldn’t 3 rifles suffice ? How many unfired rounds, how many shell casings ? One would think the total would be 1,000.
    Each of these rifles has a unique serial number, what is the ownership history of each of them from the time they left the factories ?
    How come the photos released of the alleged room in which was his body show a light sprinkling of 5.56mm shell casings only, rather than a mix of 5.56 and 7.62mm, as these were the claimed calibres ? How come the floor area was not ankle deep in shell casings ?
    CCTV everywhere within the hotel would show whether there were many trips made to his room, or just the one, using a luggage trolley with much more there than just, say, two suitcases ? Either way, casino security staff, especially, would be curious, would they not, with the zillions in money going thru the place ?
    Why have the police not released the raw hotel cctv ?
    Why were two windows knocked out on the 32nd floor ?
    Why does a female cab driver’s video – as she was slowly driving, at about 5min show flashes consistent with the cyclic rate of fire of a automatic weapon at about Level 4 of the hotel ?
    Was the reason for the 23 rifles – plus another 19 at his home, to deflect from that a medium machine gun of 7.62mm was at play, which under existing laws is extremely difficult to obtain, including a 8 month waiting period while the FBI does a background check ?

    ed note–all good question MM, but the sum of them added together does not equate ‘false flag’ or ‘hoax’, anymore than the questions surrounding other events of this type including Sandy Hook, ‘proves’ that it ‘never happened’.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Discover more from The Ugly Truth

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading