ed note–yes, you are reading it correctly, ladies and Gentile-men, a hardcore, warmongering NeoCon operative for Israel who never saw a war he didn’t like now ‘advising’ Americans to ‘dial down’ their war fever with regards to Ukraine.
So, given as out-of-character as this is, since, after all, this is MAX BOOT, one of the architects of that Judaic bloodbath known as the ‘War On Terror’ that to date has seen the ANNIHILATION of at least 2 sovereign countries, the question that needs asking and answering is ‘what gives?’
Has the leopard changed his spots?
Turned over a new leaf?
Had his own personal ‘coming to Jesus’ moment?
Au contraire, mes amis…
The ‘Boot’ now ‘advising’ angry Americans to ‘dial down’ on their war fever is merely doing what those of his ‘pedigree’ do as part of Judea’s ‘protocols’ and as ‘standard operating procedure’ in moving forward with their plans, which is to confuse the Gentile mind with all sorts of inconsistencies, contradictions, half-truths, untruths, etc and all of this part and parcel of that ages-old strategy which can be summed up in a catchy little phrase utilizing only a handful of words, which is that–
FISH SWIM, BIRDS FLY, AND JEWS LIE…
So the obvious question that needs to be asked is–
WHY?
and–
WHAT?
–is it that Boot and the same ‘Deep State’ that he serves as an intelligence operative seek to achieve with this little ‘epistle’?
Well, several possible explanations exist. It is highly likely that when Israeli Prime Minister Bennett recently met with Putin to discuss some cessation of violence in Ukraine, the Russian President laid out all the evidence he had of Israel’s involvement in the planned sabotage of Chernobyl and the dangerous radiological ‘event’ that would have taken place and gave him the bad news that the Jewish state was next on the Russian military’s ‘menu’ after Ukraine.
Equally possible is that Boot and his Judaic confreres have been ‘feeling the heat’ following what was VERY PUBLICALLY AND VERY LOUDLY brought about through their ‘journalistic endeavors’ viz the destruction in the Middle East and are anxious therefore in securing a ‘situation’ wherein whatever happens with regards to American/NATO military action against Russia that Judea’s fingerprints are nowhere to be found at the ‘scene of the crime’.
Lest we forget, this is the same ‘Max Boot’ who penned an OpEd semi-recently entitled ‘It’s time to retire the ‘neocon’ label’ where he writes about–
…the canard that neocons were responsible for the Iraq War…The ‘neocons’ were mere second-tier officials such as Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, Undersecretary of Defense Douglas Feith and vice-presidential chief of staff Scooter Libby and were not the decision-makers. The decision to invade was made by President George W. Bush in consultation with Vice President Richard B. Cheney, national security adviser Condoleezza Rice, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Secretary of State Colin Powell. None of them would ever label themselves a ‘neocon.’
Remember as well that following the war crime disasters in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, etc, that the organized forces of Anti-Gentilism through 5th-column ‘agencies’ as ADL, SPLC, American Jewish Congress, etc, wrote screeching OpEds and ‘open letters’ to various public-figure individuals decrying the ‘canard’ and the ‘anti-Semitic conspiracy theory’ that organized Jewish interests were the driving force that brought about the war when in fact it was very much the case in numbers that ran as high as 666%, to wit–
Now, as far as the ‘particulars’ and the ‘protocols’ of what Boot writes herein, take stock of the following–
…In later years that same warlike impulse would lead us into misbegotten conflicts in Vietnam and Iraq…
–And compare this with what Boot wrote just prior to the same ‘misbegotten’ invasion of Iraq–
Once Afghanistan has been dealt with, America should turn its attention to Iraq…Once we have deposed Saddam, we can impose an American-led, international regency in Baghdad, to go along with the one in Kabul…It is a matter of self-defense: Saddam is currently working to acquire weapons of mass destruction that he or his confederates will unleash against America…
Again, that catchy-little phrase appearing above needs to be consulted.
Nexto–
There are increasingly loud demands for the establishment of a no-fly zone. There have even been calls for assassinating Russian dictator Vladimir Putin from Sean Hannity and Sen. Lindsey Graham. Those are all bad ideas that would be likely to backfire.
Remember that the destruction of Iraq, that ‘misbegotten’ war which Boot supported with 666% of his diabolical being, began with a ‘no-fly zone’ and ended with Saddam Hussein’s assassination on the very same day that Jews around the world were ‘celebrating’ their infernal feast of Purim.
Yes, there are several ‘mysteries’ associated with exactly WHY Boot has chosen to verbalize in this manner, but one thing is for sure–the reasons for doing so are rooted in Judaic intrigue and in making war against the collective Gentile mind.
By Max Boot
‘Beware the fury of an aroused democracy,’ Dwight D. Eisenhower wrote at the beginning of World War II. His warning was apt: The United States would mobilize to defeat both Germany and Japan. But in later years that same warlike impulse would lead us into misbegotten conflicts in Vietnam and Iraq. The fury of an aroused democracy needs to be carefully channeled and controlled lest it draw America into wars that we don’t need and can’t win.
That is a warning worth keeping in mind today as Americans unite in righteous anger at Russia for its invasion of Ukraine. The official U.S. response — arming Ukraine and sanctioning Russia — has been effective. But many want to go much further. There are increasingly loud demands, including from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, for the establishment of a no-fly zone. There have even been calls for assassinating Russian dictator Vladimir Putin from those geopolitical savants, Sean Hannity and Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.). Those are all bad ideas that would be likely to backfire.
U.S. attempts to overthrow or kill foreign leaders during the Cold War seldom achieved the results we were aiming for. When such plots failed, as with Fidel Castro, they resulted in embarrassment for the United States and a dangerous escalation of tensions. The Cuban missile crisis was triggered, in part, by a Soviet desire to safeguard its Caribbean client from being ousted by the Kennedy administration. Former New York Times reporter Philip Shenon even argued in his book ‘A Cruel and Shocking Act’ that Cuban agents in Mexico City encouraged Lee Harvey Oswald to murder John F. Kennedy because they knew JFK was trying to kill Castro.
The only thing worse than U.S. plots that failed were those that succeeded: In the Dominican Republic and Soviet Vietnam, the United States backed coup plotters who killed presidents Rafael Trujillo in 1961 and Ngo Dinh Diem in 1963, resulting in instability that eventually drew in U.S. troops.
What, in this historical record, gives anyone any confidence that the U.S. government could either succeed in killing Putin or in managing the fallout? Loose talk of assassinating the Russian tyrant — especially from a U.S. senator — sacrifices America’s moral high ground and undermines our strategy. We need to make clear to Putin that he is better off withdrawing from Ukraine than fighting to the death. Trying to kill him won’t work and doesn’t help. For the same reason, now is not the time for war crimes prosecutions of Putin. Save him an off-ramp.
A no-fly zone is another extraordinarily dangerous idea. Let’s be clear about what this entails: U.S. aircraft firing on Russian aircraft, radars and surface-to-air missile sites. The Russians would fire back. There would be casualties on both sides, and war fever could easily get out of control. Are we really prepared to go to war with a nuclear-armed state? The United States wisely resisted that temptation during the Cold War even when it meant standing by and watching Russian tanks snuff out rebellions in Hungary in 1956 and Czechoslovakia in 1968. The same calculus applies today.
It’s not even clear how much a no-fly zone would accomplish, since so much of the damage on Ukrainian cities is being inflicted by Russian artillery and rockets, not aircraft. If we really want to protect the Ukrainians, U.S. aircraft would have to attack Russian ground columns. The Russians would then be within their rights to attack the bases those U.S. aircraft were flying from in nearby NATO states. Then we really would be in World War III. And, no, we wouldn’t be saved by former president Donald Trump’s childish suggestion to paint F-22’s — an airplane operated only by the United States — with Chinese flags.
But just because we’re not willing to risk World War III doesn’t mean that we can’t effectively oppose Russian aggression. Look at U.S. support for the Afghan mujahideen in the 1980s. Ukrainian troops are using missiles such as the American-made Stingers to shoot down Russian aircraft. Russia will never be able to claim air supremacy as long as the flow of Stingers continues. Eastern European NATO members should also provide Ukraine with Soviet fighter jets from their arsenals, while the United States should lead the way in embargoing Russian oil.
Some are alarmed that if we don’t get directly involved in fighting Russia, NATO states will be next. But Russia is so bogged down, it’s impossible to imagine Putin attacking anyone else anytime soon. And while Putin is evil, he isn’t suicidal. He is so eager to safeguard his own health that he makes his own aides sit at the end of a preposterously long table. He isn’t going to attack NATO territory, because the result would be a war he couldn’t win — and probably wouldn’t survive.
The U.S. and European reaction to the Russian invasion has sent a clear signal to Putin and other despots such as Xi Jinping: Beware the fury of aroused democracies. Don’t undermine the effectiveness of our current policy with self-sabotaging acts of overreach.