ed note–as always, lots to ‘unpack’ in this one, ladies and Gentile-men…
First and foremost, let’s get a lil’ ‘biblical’ here–
‘Why do you not understand what I am saying? It is because you are unable to accept the truth. You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out his desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, refusing to uphold the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, because he is a liar, and the father of lies.’
These words are of course those of Jesus Christ, the founding father of the ‘anti-Zionist’ movement who–among other things He did and said–pegged the followers of Torah Judah-ism for what they were, are, and always will be–‘children of their father, the devil’, and members of a spiritual race whose ‘native tongue’ is lying, deception, and duplicity, a fact made Kristol clear not only by Jesus’ words, but as well, the history of the last 3,000+ years, the importance of which unfortunately has had no effect on the collective Gentile mind, and of those, Christians in particular.
Now, as it all pertains to the details of the news story below, nota bene the following–
The truth does not need the force of law to defend it.
Only lies that cannot withstand scrutiny, facts, and reason require the business end of a bayonet in protecting them, and the various Jepileptic fits in which the followers of Torah Judah-ism have engaged themselves throughout their long history with Gentiles, wherein innocent persons were stoned to death/crucified for daring to question the ‘protocols’ of this spiritual nightmare which the Jews plan to impose upon the world is all the proof needed in determining who are the real seekers of truth vs those who are the children of darkness and lies.
Now, as it relates to the events of Oct. 7, nota bene as well–
Obviously, there is something deeply problematic with the narrative that the Pirates of Judea have constructed surrounding the events of that day, otherwise there would be no need for threatening a 5-year prison sentence (as described in the story below) for those who deviate from the script that they–the ‘children of Israel’, as they love to refer to themselves–have written.
What are they hiding, and what is it that they are afraid of the world learning viz what really happened on that day? Why are THE SAME PEOPLE who have had laws passed throughout the West making it a crime to deviate from the narrative involving WWII and of ‘Jooish suffrink’ now pushing for similar laws where the events of Oct. 7th are involved?
Well, obviously, ladies and Gentile-men, just as the entire narrative involving the Hollerco$t is as full of holes as a block of Swiss cheese, likewise the narrative concerning Oct. 7, and particularly those parts pushing the line that ‘Israel didn’t know’ what was coming and that what took place was all the result of ‘intelligence failures’, the same excuse used in ‘explaining’ what happened on 9/11.
Now, we are forced to point this ‘no brainer’ out due to what is the distressing/depressing number of people within the ‘pro-Palestinian’ community who (due entirely to their own personal desire for it to be true) have swallowed the disinformation hook involving Oct. 7 that somehow, by the grace of Allah and the brilliance of Hamas, that the most paranoid/security-conscious state in the world was ‘bested’ by a ragtag group of 3rd world freedom fighters, and this despite the mountain of evidence that has come forth since the beginning of this disaster indicating that Israel knew as far back as an entire year beforehand that this was all forthcoming.
For those having a little trouble doing the ‘math’ involved in all of this, we’ll spell it out–
ISRAEL’S ‘DEFENSE’ IN THE COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION FOR WHAT SHE IS DOING IN MASS MURDERING OVER 30,000 INNOCENT MEN, WOMEN, AND CHILDREN IN GAZA, THE SAME ‘DEFENSE’ SHE WILL UTILIZE WHEN SHE DOES THE SAME THING IN LEBANON, THE WEST BANK, SYRIA, JORDAN, EGYPT, ETC, IS THAT SHE IS ACTING IN HER OWN ‘SELF DEFENSE’, AND THE LYNCHPIN FOR THIS ‘SELF DEFENSE’ ARGUMENT IS THE NOTION THAT SHE WAS ‘TAKEN BY SURPRISE’ VIZ THE ATTACKS OF OCT. 7.
Imagine if by some miracle a substantial percentage of the world’s people opened their eyes, had their ‘coming to Jesus’ moment, and with one voice, spoke to the fact–LOUDLY–that ‘Israel knew’ what was coming and allowed it to happen in order to kick open the door to WWIII/Armageddon, and that this–ISRAEL KNEW–became THE narrative as far as the rest of the world was concerned.
Yes, the Jews are a very powerful group of people, but if billions of people suddenly began pouring into the streets of their respective countries demanding that their governments do something to bring an end to the Gentile-cide taking place in Gaza and using the ‘ISRAEL KNEW’ narrative in making these demands, the governments of the world, including those of the West, would have no choice but to acquiesce to the rising tide of anger, and no, the Jews would be powerless to stop it.
In light of the growing denials of the Hamas-led atrocities on October 7—in which over 240 mostly civilians were kidnapped, and over 1,200 were brutally raped, maimed, and murdered—a new bill presented to the Israeli Knesset seeks to punish would-be deniers with five years in prison.
The text of the proposed law first establishes that ‘On October 7, Hamas terrorists and their aides committed a massacre of Israeli residents living near the border with the Gaza Strip. In this framework, hundreds of civilians, men and women, girls and boys, were kidnapped. During the intrusion … Hamas terrorists slaughtered, murdered, dismembered, raped, and looted over 1,400 Israeli residents living near the border … just because they were Israelis and Jews.’
The bill goes on to explain that the denial of these crimes constitutes an attempt to rewrite history and otherwise ‘hide, minimize, and facilitate the crimes committed against the Jewish people and the state of Israel.’
As punishment, the law would establish a five-year offense ‘for those who publish things that would deny the massacre or downplay its dimensions.’ It would similarly slap offenders with a five-year term should they publish words of praise, sympathy, or identification with Hamas’ atrocities.
Bill has support from across the Israeli political spectrum
Knesset Member Oded Forer, from the opposition Yisrael Beiteinu party, introduced the bill and is already gaining support from a broad spectrum of lawmakers in both the coalition and opposition.
Responding to the bill in the Ministerial Committee for Legislation, Justice Minister Yariv Levin from Prime Minister Netanyahu’s leading Likud party stated that while he would have preferred a better phrasing within the text, that nevertheless the law represents a statement to the world, that ‘we are fighting the phenomenon of denial’, and therefore, our decision not to approve the bill would send a message exactly opposite of the message we should send.’
For this reason, it seems he will support the bill, along with members of Knesset from practically every party in the present government—including the Likud, the ultra-Orthodox Shas and United Torah Judaism parties, the Religious Zionist Party, Otzma Yehudit, and opposition parties like Yesh Atid, Yisrael Beiteinu, and National Unity.
Still, serious concerns have been raised about the bill’s potentially abusive application and even its very necessity.
Attorney Gil Gan-Mor, the Director of the Association for Civil Rights in Israel [ACRI], tells The Media Line, ‘The criminalization of expressions should be preserved for extreme circumstances where there is a real and imminent threat, such as incitement to violence. The denial of the massacre is regrettable and flagrant, but it is not one of those extreme cases.’
Additionally, pointing to the ambiguous wording, Gan-Mor says it would be difficult to predict how it would be enforced. ‘For example, a person claiming that the response to the massacre is exaggerated, or attempting to show a historical context may find themselves investigated by the police for downplaying the dimensions of the massacre.’
Such laws have a chilling effect on freedom of expression, he says. ‘Dealing with these issues should be through arguments and education, not draconian laws,’ he continues – particularly amidst the era of overexposure to fake news and misinformation on social media. ‘In Israel, there are quite a few people who deny the Nakba, for example,’ says Gan-Mor.
Finally, seemingly adding credence to concerns is the fact that there is already a law on the books in Israel prohibiting identification with and support for terrorist acts.