The conspiracy theorist Alex Jones faces three defamation lawsuits filed by the relatives of Sandy Hook victims.
ed note–we’ve said it before, but for reasons of being thorough, we’ll say it again.
Not wanting to say we told ya so, but we did.
The entire ‘Sandy Hook Hoax’ nonsense that took off like a wildfire within certain neighborhoods within the ‘911 Truth Movement’ was indeed a psyops from the beginning. Like a ticking time bomb, it was designed to destroy the credibility of anyone offering any alternative perspective or theory to the conventional spoon-fed disinfo given to the masses in the aftermath of each and every traumatic event that has deep political implications associated with it. Furthermore, the real aim of this psyop rooted in ‘cognitive infiltration’ as proposed by Obama’s then Information Czar Cass Sunstein is in frightening away those intelligence/law enforcement professionals whose credibility as operatives with an inside view of those aforementioned traumatic events from coming forward and spilling the beans for fear of being associated with the nutters.
Alex Jones is not being targeted because he is a ‘truther’ who is a threat to the New World Order. The daily dish he serves is so winding, meandering, contradictory adn convoluted that no sane person would get near it. Nor is he being targeted because he has shed incriminating light on past events such as JFK, 911, USS LIBERTY, Oklahoma City, etc. He is being targeted because he is the biggest and therefore garners the most attention and thus, as far as Judea, Inc is concerned, produces ‘maximum yield’ in the ‘controlled demolition’ process which they are waging against us.
None of what is taking place now, nor what is sure to take place should be in the least bit surprising to anyone with 3 functioning brain cells, as it was as difficult to predict as a rumble of thunder following a bolt of lightening.
A Texas judge denied the motion by the conspiracy theorist Alex Jones to dismiss a defamation lawsuit brought against him and his Infowars operation by the parents of a Sandy Hook shooting victim, in a ruling released on Thursday.
The lawsuit was filed in state district court in Austin by Veronique De La Rosa and Leonard Pozner, parents of Noah Pozner, who was 6 years old when he was killed in the 2012 mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn.
On his radio broadcast and in videos, Mr. Jones for years spread bogus claims that the shooting was a “false flag,” an event staged by the government as part of an effort to confiscate Americans’ firearms, and that the parents of the children killed were “crisis actors.”
After Mr. Pozner succeeded in getting an Infowars video casting doubt on the shooting removed from YouTube, Mr. Jones showed his audience Mr. Pozner’s personal information and maps to addresses associated with his family, court documents say. Mr. Jones also falsely accused Ms. De La Rosa of participating in a faked interview with Anderson Cooper of CNN after the shooting, according to court documents.
Subsequent death threats and harassment have forced the Pozner family to move seven times. They currently live in hiding.
The Pozner case is one of three defamation lawsuits, including another in Texas and one in Connecticut, filed by relatives of nine Sandy Hook victims. Lawyers for Mr. Jones on Thursday sought the dismissal on free speech grounds of a defamation case filed with the Austin court by Neil Heslin, whose son, Jesse Lewis, was killed at Sandy Hook.
The same judge issued a more qualified ruling against Mr. Jones in a separate defamation case brought by Marcel Fontaine, who was falsely identified on the Infowars website as the gunman in the Parkland, Fla., school shooting in February.
After the Infowars report, Mr. Fontaine was subjected to months of harassment, including threats at his workplace. Mr. Fontaine claimed defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The judge upheld Mr. Fontaine’s defamation claim, but denied his emotional distress one.
The judge also ruled that Mr. Fontaine could sue Mr. Jones’s business and the Infowars employee who wrongly identified him as the gunman, but that he could not sue Mr. Jones personally.
Mr. Jones was trying to have the Pozner and Fontaine cases dismissed under the Texas Citizens Participation Act, which protects citizens’ right to free speech against plaintiffs who aim to silence them through costly litigation. His lawyers are seeking a dismissal of the Heslin case on the same grounds.
The Pozner family, Mr. Heslin and Mr. Fontaine are represented by Mark Bankston and William Ogden of Farrar & Ball, a law firm based in Houston.
One thought on “Judge Rules Against Alex Jones and Infowars in Sandy Hook Lawsuit”
“He is being targeted because he is the biggest and therefore garners the most attention and thus, as far as Judea, Inc is concerned, produces ‘maximum yield’ in the ‘controlled demolition’ process which they are waging against us.”
Very appropriate choice of words after Netanyahu’s threats from Dimona today.
“He is being targeted because he is the biggest and therefore garners the most attention and thus, as far as Judea, Inc is concerned, produces ‘maximum yield’ in the ‘controlled demolition’ process which they are waging against us.”
Very appropriate choice of words after Netanyahu’s threats from Dimona today.