‘It’s clear that the international community won’t accept it,’ argues Miki Zohar in response to calls for ‘voluntary’ resettlement of Palestinians; Shasha-Biton also condemns plan
ed note–as always, lots of important protocols that every Gentile with a vested interest in his/her own future survival needs to know about this one.
First, we’re gonna get a ‘lil biblical’ here…
‘…The Israelites did as Moses instructed and asked the Egyptians for their various articles of silver and gold…The Lord had made the Egyptians favorably disposed toward the Israelites, and thus, they gave over all the gold and silver asked of them, and in so doing, the Israelites plundered the Egyptians…’
This little section comes from the book of Exodus, chapter 12, verses 35-36, and describes the manner in which the Hebrews, Shebrews, Israelites, Judah-ites, Judeans, Jews–whatever combination of consonants and vowels one wants to use in describing them–stole all the wealth of Egypt before high-tailing it out of that country and into the ‘promised land’, after which time they engaged in the same kind of mass murder/Genocide that the entire world is witnessing take place right now in Gaza.
Now, the relevant part of that previous verse is as follows–
‘The Lord had made the Egyptians favorably disposed toward the Israelites…’
In other words, ladies and Gentile-men, the Egyptians liked and (worse still) TRUSTED the Hebrews, Shebrews, Israelites, etc, etc, etc…
MAJOR mistake…
…and it was this–the Gentiles of Egypt being ‘favorably disposed’ towards the children of Israel–that resulted in them being robbed of every item of value that they owned.
And likewise, just like that often-used, well-worn truism concerning an old dog being taught new tricks, the Gentiles are still at it.
Due to the trusting and gullible nature of the non-Hebraic psyche, where Gentiles accept other people at face value without understanding that there are some categories of people–the most important of which obviously being those same aforementioned ‘children of Israel’–who are just no damned good and cannot be trusted, in the same manner, the uncircumcised brain seems unable to do the simple math in figuring out that whenever the followers of Judah-ism are involved, it is never a ‘face value’ thing, but rather, nuanced with multiple layers of important info that must be plugged into the equation in arriving at the right answer.
In the case involving the story below, it is the fact that there seems to be a ‘difference of opinion’ within Netanyahu’s cabinet between those of the more ‘cautious’ nature who recognize the existential threats baked into what is right now growing world awareness viz the feral and barbaric nature of the entire ‘Jewish state’ thing vs those who simply don’t give a good Goddamn about world opinion and are determined to move forward with their plans, come hell or high water.
In other words, ladies and Gents, a ‘gang war’ within La Kosher Nostra between–
1. Hotheads who see no problem with ‘crossing the line’ in the execution of Kosher Nostra violence against millions of helpless Gentiles…
vs–
2. Those smarter elements who understand that the 99 to 1 ratio of the world’s population favoring the Gentiles can/will have profoundly negative results against the entire ‘Jewish State’ thing once the rest of the 99% decides that they have had enough of the entire Apocalyptic affair and engages in a repeat performance of what took place viz the destruction of Joo-roo-salem, first in 586 BC by the Babylonians and then in 70AD by the Romans.
Now, the ‘problematic’ thing associated with what the ‘hotheads’ are discussing and what appears to be their COMPLETE disdain/disconnect with any possible backlash that may result is the part in all of this that has been left unsaid but needs to be examined, and which we’ll introduce with a lil’ pictographical digression–
In any and all discussions where the topic of Hebraic control of the various governments of the West (ZOG) dares to raise its head, all critics of Zionism will indeed ‘go there’ in pointing out the manner in which the ‘children of Israel’ secure the cooperation (subservience) of various world governments (mostly those in the West) through money, bribes, blackmail, media-driven support or media-driven character assassination…
The one thing however, the ONE THING, that they never discuss is the threat of using WMDs, either nuclear or biological (as took place in 2020 with Israel’s release of Covid 19) in ‘sealing the deal’, when in fact, this–the threat of lighting off a few of those nukes that the Jypsy State smuggled into every world capital decades ago–represents the ‘offer that can’t be refused’ and which is the most likely reason that the Ben Gvirs, Smotrich’s and Netanyahus are not as worried about negative world opinion as are the more ‘cautious’ members of the most apocalyptically-dangerous crime syndicate ever to plague God’s green earth, the Jewish State.
Times of Israel
Two members of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s cabinet, including one from his own party, came out swinging Thursday against the support voiced by two of their fellow ministers for the resettlement of Gazans abroad, describing such a policy as unrealistic and detrimental to Israel’s international standing.
Culture and Sports Minister Miki Zohar and minister without portfolio Yifat Shasha-Biton both voiced criticism of Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben Gvir’s calls for ‘voluntary emigration’ in separate interviews with the Ynet news site on Thursday morning — after international actors including the United States, the European Union, France and Germany condemned the planned expulsion of Palestinians as a ‘violation of international law’.
Doubling down on his support for encouraging ‘voluntary emigration’ of the Strip’s population to other countries as part of his postwar vision, Finance Minister Smotrich on Wednesday claimed that ‘more than 70 percent of the Israeli public today supports’ such ‘a humanitarian solution,’ but did not provide a source for this statistic.
A resettlement policy is necessary, he said, because ‘a small country like ours cannot afford a reality where four minutes away from our communities there is a hotbed of hatred and terrorism, where two million people wake up every morning with aspiration for the destruction of the State of Israel and with a desire to slaughter and rape and murder Jews wherever they are.’
Zohar, a member of Netanyahu’s ruling Likud party, was unconvinced.
‘It’s not realistic, and it’s clear that the international community will not accept it… with things like this, even if you have a belief or a goal like this, it needs to be discussed and debated behind closed doors,’ he told Ynet.
‘It’s clear that there is nobody in Israel who wouldn’t be happy if the Gazans decided to emigrate voluntarily if they were happy to leave, but this is not remotely realistic and a public discussion of the issue is unhelpful,’ he declared, adding that ‘we see the repercussions, we see what’s happening with the Americans.’
The US State Department on Tuesday called out Smotrich and Ben Gvir’s rhetoric as ‘inflammatory and irresponsible,’ amid growing frustration in Washington with Netanyahu’s hard-right government.
For months, Netanyahu has bucked US requests to begin planning for who will govern the Gaza Strip after the war, ostensibly recognizing that his far-right coalition partners would reject proposals that do not include Israel’s reoccupation and resettlement of Gaza — which the security establishment and Washington oppose. A cabinet meeting on the matter was planned for Thursday.
Ben Gvir hit back at Washington shortly after it aired its criticism Tuesday, tweeting that ‘the emigration of hundreds of thousands from Gaza will allow the Jewish residents of the Strip to return home and live in security and who will protect the IDF soldiers.’
‘I really admire the United States of America but with all due respect, we are not another star in the American flag,’ he averred.
Asked if she believed that the growing discourse on transferring Gaza’s Palestinian population was detrimental to Israel’s international standing, Shasha-Biton — who entered the coalition as part of Gantz’s National Unity party following Hamas’s October 7 onslaught in southern Israel — told Ynet that Smotrich and Ben Gvir were ‘causing damage, period, on any level at which it can be considered.’
‘I think that everyone who sits around the government table and around the cabinet table should remember that we have a heavy responsibility to the citizens of the State of Israel. If there is nothing wise to say or something useful — then it is better to simply not say it,’ she said.
‘I think that Smotrich and Ben Gvir do not understand the magnitude of the responsibility that rests on their shoulders.’
While he has issued statements insisting that Smotrich and Ben Gvir do not represent government policy, Netanyahu himself has given the go-ahead for government members to support the plan to encourage Palestinians to leave the enclave.
Last Monday, he told a Likud faction meeting that he was working to facilitate the voluntary migration of Gazans to other countries. ‘Our problem is finding countries that are willing to absorb Gazans, and we are working on it,’ he said.
The prime minister was responding to Likud MK Danny Danon, who claimed that ‘the world is already discussing the possibilities of voluntary immigration.’
The ‘voluntary’ resettlement of Palestinians from Gaza is slowly becoming a key official policy of the government, Zman Israel, The Times of Israel’s Hebrew sister site, reported on Wednesday, citing a senior official as saying that Israel has held talks with several countries for their potential absorption.
Netanyahu’s coalition is reportedly conducting secret contacts for accepting thousands of immigrants from Gaza with Congo, in addition to other nations.
However, a senior Israeli official disputed this report yesterday, declaring that the idea that Gazans would voluntarily leave the coastal enclave is ‘a baseless illusion’ and asserting that Jerusalem is ‘not conducting any talks with any country on this issue.’
‘Let’s say Smotrich wanted to do it, what can he do? We’re not part of this. We are not in a position where we can bring people from here to Congo…we’re not in the loop,’ he said. ‘No one will absorb 2 million people, or 1 million, or 100,000, or 5,000.’