0 thoughts on “Obama: ‘Real differences’ with Netanyahu over Iran”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Intelligent & thought-provoking 'anti-Semitism' for thinking Gentiles....theuglytrutheditor@gmail.com

You must be logged in to post a comment.
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
Some people have always asked me,why I never stop studying every nuance about WW2 possible ? Because I see all ofthe Jewish tricks in the Allied Side. Wonder why FOX NEWS,and the insane Republicans quote a known bi-polar,alchoholic,bribe takeing old man,named Churchill? Because he was totally handled by the Jews. Natenyahue is a one of those ,who copy that man. He wants that speech in fromt of Congress to like ‘that great man”’warning,and pushing for war,and more war”.
Satanyahu is coming to address the US Congress to show the stooges in Washington who is the real boss. Those idiots in Congress should be ashamed of themselves by openly subdue to a foreign leader and be against their own President. In any other country this is HIGH TREASON.
[5:78] “Curses were pronounced on those among the Children of Israel who rejected Faith, by the tongue of Dawûd and of Eesâ the son of Maryam: because they disobeyed and persisted in excesses.”
MARTIN LUTHER, 16th century German religious reformer
“They (the Jews) are the real liars and bloodhounds, who have not only perverted and falsified the entire Scriptures from beginning to end and without ceasing with their interpretations. And all of the anxious sighing, longing and hoping of their hearts is directed to the time when some day they would like to deal with us heathen as they dealt with the heathen in Persia at the time of Esther… On how they love the book of Esther, which so nicely agrees with their bloodthirsty, revengeful and murderous desire and hope.
SHAW, GEORGE BERNARD. A genius of the 20th century and British dramatist.
“This is the real enemy, the invader from the East, the Druze, the ruffian, the oriental parasite; in a word: the Jew.” (London Morning Post, December 3, 1925)
If you Claim to be threatened ‘existentially’ you Claim that what you say must be considered in detail……But if your illogical Basis is that ‘all texts, and all oaths are invalid’ then you will put up this Claim simply to have more pressure on the People you address whatever the matter really is……..(You are pretty much bound to have a history of your own of thorough abuse of texts and oaths, whenever you think it to be advantageous to you, that you think you have to treat what others say, e.g. Amercans, or Iranians, in the same way, i.e. abuse of texts and oaths. )