Rubio slams Obama’s ‘lack of support for Israel’

Prominent Republican contender says president gives Iran’s leader more respect than he does Netanyahu

Times of Israel

Florida Sen. Marco Rubio criticized President Barack Obama’s foreign policy for not being sufficiently supportive of Israel. The Obama administration and its allies are in negotiations with Iran to curb Tehran’s nuclear program, an effort that Rubio said was destined to fail.

“It is a foreign policy that treats the ayatollah of Iran with more respect than the prime minister of Israel,” Rubio, speaking at the Conservative Political Action Conference, said.

At the conference, the Republican Party’s leading presidential contenders on Friday promised conservative activists they would pursue aggressive military action to prevent the spread of global terrorism, including a renewed use of ground forces in the Middle East.

Rubio said the US must “put together a coalition of armed forces from regional governments to confront them on the ground, with US special operations support, and then provide logistical support, intelligence support and the most devastating air support possible.”

As war-weary critics in both parties watched with skepticism, one Republican White House prospect after another attacked President Barack Obama’s foreign policy as far too timid as they courted thousands of conservative activists gathered in suburban Washington.

“Our position needs to be to re-engage with a strong military and a strong presence,” former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush said.

Bush added he liked the option of sending ground forces into the fight against the Islamic State group, particularly to conduct intelligence and special operations. “As we pull back, voids are filled,” Bush said.

Foreign policy was largely an afterthought in the last presidential election, but it has become a dominant theme in the early stages of the Republican race, with most of the party’s White House prospects calling for a far more muscular foreign policy than under Obama.

The large crowd at conference cheered the repeated jabs at the Democratic president, but they booed at times when speakers called for ground troops to fight Islamic State militants — a reminder that many voters are reluctant to put American troops at risk after more than a decade of war in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Former Texas Gov. Rick Perry described the Islamic State group as “the worst threat to freedom since communism,” and he declined to rule out sending American ground forces in the region.

None of those who called for the use of US ground forces against the Islamic State group specified whether they meant putting troops in the territory the militants control in Iraq, where the government has sought US help, or in Syria.

The US has called for the ouster of Syrian President Bashar Assad and is conducting airstrikes in his country without his cooperation. Ground troops would be considered an invading force by the embattled Syrian government.

There was also a word of caution from Sen. Rand Paul, a favorite of the libertarian-leaning CPAC crowd, which generally favors a smaller US footprint in the world.

“I envision an America with a national defense unparalleled, undefeatable and unencumbered by nation building,” Paul said. “As conservatives, we should not succumb to the notion that a government inept at home will somehow become successful abroad.”