5 thoughts on “The Israeli Declaration of Independence: The World Continues to Ignore its Provisions and those of the British Balfour Declaration”
How can the UN and especially the UK ignore the flagrant opposition by Israel to the original conditions set out in the 1917 Balfour declaration?
It appears that those conditions were never ever intended to be actually adhered to, nor those of the conditions of the many UN edicts concerning Israel, which in almost every case have been totally ignored, since neither the Israeli-dominated UN, not the insincere and callous UK government ever try to seek to ensure any meaningful changes in Israeli policy to bring policies into line with the Balfour declaration and the many UN edicts.
Rather, Britain effectively simply applauds every racist act of genocidal violence that Israel commits, being controlled by the same vicious madmen as Israel is. This is clearly demonstrated by the very fact that both principal political parties in Britain, the Conservative Party and the Labour Party, have memberships of MP’s in Friends of Israel groups of around 80%, who aggressively pursue an Israel first policy.
“MASS OF TRICKS: The point needs no pressing. The very fact the Balfour Declaration [from Nov 1917] was not proclaimed in Palestine until 1920 is sufficient proof of its character.
Into the Maze – Four Plain questions (examining the Balfour Declaration point by point):
Mass tricks of Balfour Declaration
1. What exactly is a “National Home”? Nobody knows. The expression was used because it was ambiguous. To Syrians it is explained as a home. Fifteen months after the British Government had declared that it viewed this ambiguity with favour, Mr Lansing, the American Foreign Secretary, was obliged to ask at the Paris Peace Conference in Paris what “National Home” meant. Dr Weizmann replied that it meant there should be established such conditions ultimately in Palestine that “Palestine shall be just as Jewish as America is American and England is English. “ Mr (as he was then) Balfour was very pleased with this reply. It is difficult to see why, since Dr Weizmann had removed with his frankness a good deal of ambiguity.
2. “Nothing shall be done,” says the vigilant Declaration, “which may prejudice the civil & religious rights of non-existing Jewish communities in Palestine.” No phrase could sound better but what exactly are “civil rights”? Again nobody knows. That is why the Declaration is anxious to guarantee them. Observe that the phrase “political rights” is not used. Political rights would have been something definite. The political rights of a people are its ownership of its country. The right to have, as Syrian-Arabs demand, “a National Government created, which shall be responsible to a Parliament elected by the people of Palestine – Muslims, Christians, and Jews.” A Subterfuge: When the Zionists drew up their programme of October 1916, the first portion of that program reads thus: “The Jewish population of Palestine shall enjoy full civic and POLITICAL rights…” no mistake here and at the end of the Balfour declaration itself is it civil rights guaranteed to the Jews? Read and see: “the rights and POLITICAL status enjoyed by the Jews.” No mistake again.
3. The third point is less important but worth noting. The people of Palestine are referred to as the “Non-Jewish communities in Palestine.” There are about 80000 Jews & 670000 non-Jews in Palestine [1922]. The word would give anybody the impression that the “non-Jewish communities” were some specialised sort of bodies & not the mass of the population.
4. Nothing, according to the declaration, is to prejudice the “political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.” What does this mean? It means that Jews, besides being put on the road to establishing a Jewish state in Palestine, are also guaranteed against not belonging to it if they don’t wish. Political Zionism may look forward, therefore, to having their cake and eating it.
The truth peeps out very clearly from this part of the Declaration. If there existed no intention in the minds of its framers of founding a Jewish state, why were they moving to protect their co-religionists from the necessity of belonging to it? If the National Home was only to be a home, the political status of Jews elsewhere could no more be altered by it than is the status of Englishman because thousands of them have homes in France & Italy. But if a state was erected in Palestine? Ah then!
[Balfour Declaration] FORMULA MAKING:
There was a meeting at the house of one of their number [British Zionist] in Feb 1917, Sir Mark Sykes was there “in his private capacity.” He was told there MUST be no internationalisation of Palestine because the Zionists desired a British protectorate with full rights to the Jews to develop as a nation. M. Nahum Sokoloff, the chief representative in Britain of the International Zionist Executive, was chosen, as the result of the meeting, to continue negotiations with Sir Mark Sykes & M. Picot, who acted for the French Government. The Zionist report says with satisfaction: “Thus opened the chapter of negotiations which ended 9 months later with the Balfour Declaration.” Still fearful of internationalisation, which would have made the Zionist state impossible, Mssrs Weizmann & Sokoloff spent some months vainly trying to get the Sykes-Picot Agreement cancelled. Though they failed in this, yet somehow internationalisation did drop out of sight.
The goal was getting visible. A number of prominent Zionists, Ahad Ha-am, the writer, Mssrs Joseph Cowen, Akiva Yaakov Ettinger, Albert Hyamson, Simon Marks, Harry Sacher, Israel Moses Sieff, Leon Simon, Samuel Tolkowsky, Aaron Aaronsohn, Vladimir (Ze’ev) Jabotinsky, Samuel Landman, & others from continental countries, as they visited England from time to time, were gathered in to form a Political Committee. Their names are of great interest, since it was they, together with well-known Zionist leaders, who began work on the “Balfour Declaration.” Many versions of the suggested formula were drafted,” says the Zionist report, “by various members of the Political Committee.” Drafts went back and forth to the Foreign Office. “Some were detailed and elaborate,” but the Government did not want to commit itself to more than a general statement of principle. Finally, a “concise and general formula was agreed upon.” This was made known to and approved by President Woodrow Wilson, Sir Mark Sykes, and Baron Edmond de Rothschild. All seemed finished. On July 18 Lord Rothschild forwarded the Balfour Declaration to Mr Balfour [to sign].”
Source: “The Palestine Deception, 1915–1923: The McMahon-Hussein Correspondence, the Balfour Declaration, and the Jewish National Home” By: J. M. N. Jeffries
Edited by William M. Mathew
More to the point:- Where the hell did Balfour, the Poms, the Hamericans or the UN think they had the RIGHT ~ moral or legal ~ to hand over Palestine to the jews or anyone else??
Sticking to the rules is irrelevant. If somebody kills and robs your whole family the crime is NOT lessened if the stolen loot is donated to charity.
The jews have no more right to ANY part of Palestine than that other nazi, Hitler, had to Poland or France.
Jackson the UN and other international ,and nstions which supported the creation of Israel did so because of only ONE reason…..MONEY.
The Private International banking system which originated in,and ruled the British zEmoire/US Fed.
They bought out whole governments by promoting wars and revolutions against those who opposed them….ie Germany twice, Russia .
After WW 2 there power became absolute !
They have created a western dictatorship/ oligarchy under the name ” Democracy “.
Israel was planned eons ago for the ” Chosen People” of Yahweh to rule the planet from.
” A light to all the nations”.
” Thou shall no other Gods but Yahweh “.
See Benjamin Freedman exposes Zionist control of America, You Tube.
What does Organized Usury do for a living? They’re farmers. They plant money among ordinary people everywhere who devote their entire lives to earning just enough money to continue living. And that money just grows like mad. And the farmers keep on harvesting the money crop and purchasing more farms which enables them to make more and more money.
What is money? Money is power – the power to command people to do whatever you want. Ordinary people love using that power. It enables them, I mean us, to survive, to go on living, and earning more of that wonderful stuff. The money farmers use money to rule the ordinary people of the world.
And everybody’s happy so long as they get enough of that most wonderful of all commodities to do what they do.
Quite a neat set up, eh?
In the name of Money, Power, and the Holy Wealth, Amen.
How can the UN and especially the UK ignore the flagrant opposition by Israel to the original conditions set out in the 1917 Balfour declaration?
It appears that those conditions were never ever intended to be actually adhered to, nor those of the conditions of the many UN edicts concerning Israel, which in almost every case have been totally ignored, since neither the Israeli-dominated UN, not the insincere and callous UK government ever try to seek to ensure any meaningful changes in Israeli policy to bring policies into line with the Balfour declaration and the many UN edicts.
Rather, Britain effectively simply applauds every racist act of genocidal violence that Israel commits, being controlled by the same vicious madmen as Israel is. This is clearly demonstrated by the very fact that both principal political parties in Britain, the Conservative Party and the Labour Party, have memberships of MP’s in Friends of Israel groups of around 80%, who aggressively pursue an Israel first policy.
“MASS OF TRICKS: The point needs no pressing. The very fact the Balfour Declaration [from Nov 1917] was not proclaimed in Palestine until 1920 is sufficient proof of its character.
Into the Maze – Four Plain questions (examining the Balfour Declaration point by point):
Mass tricks of Balfour Declaration
1. What exactly is a “National Home”? Nobody knows. The expression was used because it was ambiguous. To Syrians it is explained as a home. Fifteen months after the British Government had declared that it viewed this ambiguity with favour, Mr Lansing, the American Foreign Secretary, was obliged to ask at the Paris Peace Conference in Paris what “National Home” meant. Dr Weizmann replied that it meant there should be established such conditions ultimately in Palestine that “Palestine shall be just as Jewish as America is American and England is English. “ Mr (as he was then) Balfour was very pleased with this reply. It is difficult to see why, since Dr Weizmann had removed with his frankness a good deal of ambiguity.
2. “Nothing shall be done,” says the vigilant Declaration, “which may prejudice the civil & religious rights of non-existing Jewish communities in Palestine.” No phrase could sound better but what exactly are “civil rights”? Again nobody knows. That is why the Declaration is anxious to guarantee them. Observe that the phrase “political rights” is not used. Political rights would have been something definite. The political rights of a people are its ownership of its country. The right to have, as Syrian-Arabs demand, “a National Government created, which shall be responsible to a Parliament elected by the people of Palestine – Muslims, Christians, and Jews.” A Subterfuge: When the Zionists drew up their programme of October 1916, the first portion of that program reads thus: “The Jewish population of Palestine shall enjoy full civic and POLITICAL rights…” no mistake here and at the end of the Balfour declaration itself is it civil rights guaranteed to the Jews? Read and see: “the rights and POLITICAL status enjoyed by the Jews.” No mistake again.
3. The third point is less important but worth noting. The people of Palestine are referred to as the “Non-Jewish communities in Palestine.” There are about 80000 Jews & 670000 non-Jews in Palestine [1922]. The word would give anybody the impression that the “non-Jewish communities” were some specialised sort of bodies & not the mass of the population.
4. Nothing, according to the declaration, is to prejudice the “political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.” What does this mean? It means that Jews, besides being put on the road to establishing a Jewish state in Palestine, are also guaranteed against not belonging to it if they don’t wish. Political Zionism may look forward, therefore, to having their cake and eating it.
The truth peeps out very clearly from this part of the Declaration. If there existed no intention in the minds of its framers of founding a Jewish state, why were they moving to protect their co-religionists from the necessity of belonging to it? If the National Home was only to be a home, the political status of Jews elsewhere could no more be altered by it than is the status of Englishman because thousands of them have homes in France & Italy. But if a state was erected in Palestine? Ah then!
[Balfour Declaration] FORMULA MAKING:
There was a meeting at the house of one of their number [British Zionist] in Feb 1917, Sir Mark Sykes was there “in his private capacity.” He was told there MUST be no internationalisation of Palestine because the Zionists desired a British protectorate with full rights to the Jews to develop as a nation. M. Nahum Sokoloff, the chief representative in Britain of the International Zionist Executive, was chosen, as the result of the meeting, to continue negotiations with Sir Mark Sykes & M. Picot, who acted for the French Government. The Zionist report says with satisfaction: “Thus opened the chapter of negotiations which ended 9 months later with the Balfour Declaration.” Still fearful of internationalisation, which would have made the Zionist state impossible, Mssrs Weizmann & Sokoloff spent some months vainly trying to get the Sykes-Picot Agreement cancelled. Though they failed in this, yet somehow internationalisation did drop out of sight.
The goal was getting visible. A number of prominent Zionists, Ahad Ha-am, the writer, Mssrs Joseph Cowen, Akiva Yaakov Ettinger, Albert Hyamson, Simon Marks, Harry Sacher, Israel Moses Sieff, Leon Simon, Samuel Tolkowsky, Aaron Aaronsohn, Vladimir (Ze’ev) Jabotinsky, Samuel Landman, & others from continental countries, as they visited England from time to time, were gathered in to form a Political Committee. Their names are of great interest, since it was they, together with well-known Zionist leaders, who began work on the “Balfour Declaration.” Many versions of the suggested formula were drafted,” says the Zionist report, “by various members of the Political Committee.” Drafts went back and forth to the Foreign Office. “Some were detailed and elaborate,” but the Government did not want to commit itself to more than a general statement of principle. Finally, a “concise and general formula was agreed upon.” This was made known to and approved by President Woodrow Wilson, Sir Mark Sykes, and Baron Edmond de Rothschild. All seemed finished. On July 18 Lord Rothschild forwarded the Balfour Declaration to Mr Balfour [to sign].”
Source: “The Palestine Deception, 1915–1923: The McMahon-Hussein Correspondence, the Balfour Declaration, and the Jewish National Home” By: J. M. N. Jeffries
Edited by William M. Mathew
More to the point:- Where the hell did Balfour, the Poms, the Hamericans or the UN think they had the RIGHT ~ moral or legal ~ to hand over Palestine to the jews or anyone else??
Sticking to the rules is irrelevant. If somebody kills and robs your whole family the crime is NOT lessened if the stolen loot is donated to charity.
The jews have no more right to ANY part of Palestine than that other nazi, Hitler, had to Poland or France.
Jackson the UN and other international ,and nstions which supported the creation of Israel did so because of only ONE reason…..MONEY.
The Private International banking system which originated in,and ruled the British zEmoire/US Fed.
They bought out whole governments by promoting wars and revolutions against those who opposed them….ie Germany twice, Russia .
After WW 2 there power became absolute !
They have created a western dictatorship/ oligarchy under the name ” Democracy “.
Israel was planned eons ago for the ” Chosen People” of Yahweh to rule the planet from.
” A light to all the nations”.
” Thou shall no other Gods but Yahweh “.
See Benjamin Freedman exposes Zionist control of America, You Tube.
What does Organized Usury do for a living? They’re farmers. They plant money among ordinary people everywhere who devote their entire lives to earning just enough money to continue living. And that money just grows like mad. And the farmers keep on harvesting the money crop and purchasing more farms which enables them to make more and more money.
What is money? Money is power – the power to command people to do whatever you want. Ordinary people love using that power. It enables them, I mean us, to survive, to go on living, and earning more of that wonderful stuff. The money farmers use money to rule the ordinary people of the world.
And everybody’s happy so long as they get enough of that most wonderful of all commodities to do what they do.
Quite a neat set up, eh?
In the name of Money, Power, and the Holy Wealth, Amen.