Trump’s ‘rigged election’ claims may cause lasting damage

It’s not clear if the Republican candidate doesn’t understand the harm his words could cause US democracy — or if he simply doesn’t care

ed note–No, we’re not comparing Donald Trump to Jesus, God forbid. We are using this as a reminder as to how things turn out when organized Jewish interests get involved in the ‘electoral’ process and how in one famous instance they had an innocent man condemned to death by crucifixion for His political views and had a convicted murderer freed, and all of done by ‘getting out the vote’.

Of the many things Trump has said in the last year that have caused the JPTB a measurable amount of angst and which have resulted in an even more measurable amount of screeching–from his ‘dancing Muslims in New Jersey on the morning of 9/11’ to his talking about Jews controlling politicians with their money to his recent use of the term ‘international bankers’, probably the most problematic is this one concerning ‘rigged elections’.

Organized Jewish interests operating in media, politics, academia et al have dedicated an incalculable amount of planning, time, money, and other resources towards re-inventing Americans into brutish, thuggish, prone-to-violence warriors psychologically programmed to function as Stormtroopers in rebuilding Zion, exactly as the protocols of both Judaism and Freemasonry dictate. The liability of creating such a creature however is if the mad scientist who engineered this Frankenstein monster loses control over his experiment, which could realistically take place if the American people come to understand that their vote means nothing, thus leaving Americans to utilize the one thing which they do well–use violence as the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd solution to any problem.

If Trump loses the election and is able to make a cogent case for criminal vote fraud, the ‘movement’ that right now represents a relative handful of people will swell by millions or even tens of millions over night. Those who yesterday shied away from those openly discussing the problems that organized Jewish interests pose to the collective well being of all mankind will abandon all such reservations and will become full-fledged, card-carrying members, something which the JPTB have doubtless already surmised and who will–if necessary–assassinate Trump in order to keep him quiet post-election. 

Times of Israel

Donald Trump keeps peddling the notion the vote may be rigged. It’s not clear if he does not understand the potential damage of his words — or he simply does not care.

Trump’s claim — made without evidence — undercuts the essence of American democracy, the idea that US elections are both free and fair, with the vanquished peacefully stepping aside for the victor. His repeated assertions are sowing suspicion among his most ardent supporters, raising the possibility that millions of people may not accept the results on November 8 if Trump does not win.

The responsibilities for the New York billionaire in such a scenario are minimal. Trump holds no public office and has said he’ll simply go back to his “very good way of life” if he loses.

Instead, it would be Democrat Hillary Clinton and Congressional Republicans, should they win, who would be left trying to govern in a country divided not just by ideology, but also the legitimacy of the presidency.

As Trump’s campaign careens from crisis to crisis, he’s broadened his unfounded allegations that Clinton, her backers and the media are conspiring to steal the election. He’s accused Clinton of meeting with global financial powers to “plot the destruction of US sovereignty” and argued his opponent shouldn’t have even been allowed to seek the White House.

“Hillary Clinton should have been prosecuted and should be in jail,” Trump wrote Saturday morning on Twitter. “Instead she is running for president in what looks like a rigged election.”

Trump is referring to Clinton’s use of a private email system while serving as secretary of state. Republicans (and some Democrats) have harshly criticized her decision to do so, but the FBI did not recommend anyone face criminal charges for her use of a private email address run on a personal server.

Trump has offered only broad assertions about the potential for voter fraud and the complaints that the several women who have recently alleged he sexually accosted them are part of an effort to smear his campaign.

“It’s one big ugly lie, it’s one big fix,” Trump said at a Friday rally in North Carolina, adding later: “And the only thing I say is hopefully, hopefully, our patriotic movement will overcome this terrible deception.”

Trump’s supporters appear to be taking his grievances seriously. Only about a third of Republicans said they have a great deal or quite a bit of confidence that votes on Election Day will be counted fairly, according to recent poll from the Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research.

During a campaign event Tuesday with Trump running mate Mike Pence, a voter said she was deeply concerned about voter fraud and vowed to be “ready for a revolution” if Clinton wins.

“Don’t say that,” Pence said, waving away the woman’s rallying cry.

There is no evidence voter fraud is a widespread problem in the United States. A study by a Loyola Law School professor found that out of 1 billion votes cast in all American elections between 2000 and 2014, there were only 31 known cases of impersonation fraud.

Trump’s motivations for stoking these sentiments seem clear.

One of his last hopes of winning the election is to suppress turnout by making these final weeks so repulsive to voters that some simply stay home. Trump advisers privately say they hope to turn off young people in particular. They lean Democratic but don’t have a long history of voting and are already skeptical of Clinton.

Trump is also likely considering how he would spin a loss to Clinton, given that he’s spent decades cultivating a brand that’s based on success and winning. His years in public life offer few examples where he’s owned up to his own failings and plenty where he’s tried to pass the blame on to others, as he’s now suggesting he would do if he’s defeated.

Clinton appears increasingly aware that if she wins, she’d arrive at the White House facing more than the usual political divides. “Damage is being done that we’re going to have to repair,” she said during a recent campaign stop.

But that task wouldn’t be Clinton’s alone.

The majority of Trump’s supporters are Republicans. If he loses, party leaders will have to reckon with how much credence they give to claims the election was rigged and how closely they can work with a president who at least some of their backers will likely view as illegitimate.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s office wouldn’t say Saturday whether he agreed with Trump’s assertions the election is being rigged. A spokeswoman for House Speaker Paul Ryan said the Wisconsin lawmaker is “fully confident the states will carry out this election with integrity.”

Republicans have already experienced the paralyzing effect of Trump stirring up questions about a president’s legitimacy. He spent years challenging President Barack Obama’s citizenship, deepening some GOP voters’s insistence that the party block the Democrat at every turn.

Jim Manley, a former adviser to Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, recalled the skepticism some Republicans had about Obama. “I’m afraid a President Clinton is going to start off with far too many people raising similar questions,” he said.