BBC-Israeli-propaganda

THE JEWISH PRESS

Lesley Klaff, senior law lecturer at Sheffield Hallam University, says the disproportionate attention given the Israeli-Palestinian conflict by the BBC, and the anti-Israel bias of its reports suggest it is “institutionally antisemitic.” Speaking on how British media coverage of Israel affects British Jews, Klaff described at a forum organized by BBC Watch earlier this month at Finchley United Synagogue in north London a BBC radio, television and online effort to skew news reporting in favor of the Palestinian point of view. She cited one glaring example in a BBC website headline that followed the murder of two Israeli Jews by an Arab terrorist at Jerusalem’s Lion’s Gate, which read: “Palestinian shot dead after Jerusalem attack kills two.”

BBC Watch, an affiliate of the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA), is dedicated to the promotion of accuracy and impartiality in the BBC’s coverage of Israel. “Three years of daily monitoring of BBC content has produced a wealth of documentation that is relevant to the charter review process,” writes BBC Watch Managing Editor Hadar Sela.

“Analysis of BBC content has raised concerns, including one about the accuracy of reporting,” Sela writes, in typical British understatement. “One recent example was the promotion of the false notion that the Israeli government intended to change the status quo on Temple Mount, broadcast on BBC World Service radio on September 13 by BBC in Arabic’s Nawal Assad. She told millions of listeners: ‘The Israeli government seems like it’s going towards a situation where there would be shared times of prayers in that area which Muslims consider to be their third holiest mosque.’”

Klaff, for her part, argued that “the BBC plays a significant role in the creation and or maintenance of negative attitudes towards British Jews,” and cited studies from the Community Security Trust and the All-Party Parliamentary Group Against Antisemitism which show a correlation between media coverage and antisemitic incidents during the Gaza war of 2014.

Chairman of UK Lawyers for Israel Jonathan Turner asked the forum audience members to raise their hands if they had ever made a complaint to the BBC, and just everyone in the room—500 Jews—raised their hands. The panel appealed to the audience to write to their MPs and to John Whittingdale, Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, urging them to use the BBC Charter Review to make the server honest in its treatment of Israel

For a list of clips from the conference click here.

For the complete, 2:23 hours click here

5 thoughts on “UK – BBC Watch Conference Cites Systemic Anti-Semitism in Coverage of Israel”
  1. “the BBC plays a significant role in the creation and or maintenance of negative attitudes towards British Jews,” and cited studies from the Community Security Trust and the All-Party Parliamentary Group Against Antisemitism which show a correlation between media coverage and antisemitic incidents during the Gaza war of 2014.
    No British Jews own actions created negative attitudes when they marched waving Israel flags showing solidarity with the murdering that was going on (and still is) at the time.

  2. must be a zio euphemism for the zionistas systematic genocide on native non jewish Palestinian population

  3. Hmmm

    Of course this is all total baloney. As is often the case with Israel the facts directly contradict the claims of suffering and discrimination of Jews in general and Israel in particular regardless of the venue. Take a long look at the startling number of known zionist Jews in key positions throughout the BBC. Then read one of any number of studies which clearly demonstrate based on analysis of actual broadcasts (forget the Jewish lobby rhetoric) that the number of articles/broadcasts biased in favor of Israel dwarf the “Pro Palestinian” commentary. (The Jewish Lobby’s general definition of antisemitic bias these days is anything that doesn’t paint the Palestinian people as terrorists or fails to cast Israel in a glowing light)

  4. Yes Harry Shade: and what is “whining against impartial reporting”?
    It is hostility to Honesty and Humility – the most important ingredients of an honourable society.
    Honesty in reporting is dedication to providing the people of your society with information that is trustworthy which is essential if the government of your society is doing things that are likely to have ill consequences for your society. It enables the people to call their government to account.
    Humility is dedication to the common good of all of the people of your society.
    What happens to honest and humble reporters?
    Think of David Kelly in the United Kingdom. He tried to report honestly and humbly (and anonymously!) to his society. Think of the honourable professional reporter(s) who tried to help him do that. Think of the official inquiry that ‘concluded’ that David Kelly committed suicide.
    How ill was and is the late David Kelly’s society?
    Peace be upon David Kelly, and upon you, Harry, for bringing Honesty and Humility out of the Shade.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Discover more from The Ugly Truth

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading