The Torah commands both love and vengeance, and in Israel, we Jews live that contradiction

The Torah commands both love and vengeance, and in Israel, we Jews live that contradiction

ed note–lots of cookies in this jar to consider.

First and foremost, please note–as we have done here somewhere between a million and a billion times, much of it with little to no great success–that it is indeed the Judaic religion that drives Zionism and all the innocent blood it has shed.

We are forced to point this out due to the distressing/depressing number of people who incessantly chirp like mindless birds that ‘Zionism and Judaism are different, distinct and ideologically opposed to each other’, BLAH, BLAH, BLAH, BLAH, BLAH, BLAH, BLAH, BLAH, BLAH….

And as ‘exhibit A’ in this ridiculous exercise, they trot out the ‘Jews of conscience’ on the left as well as cartoon characters like the bearded, unwashed and unkempt ‘rabbis’ of Neturei Karta who claim that authentic Judaism forbids the creation of a Jewish state, adding that Judaism has been ‘hijacked’ by the Zionists when in fact the commandment to build a Jewish state is there in plain, uncomplicated and easy to read/easy to understand language RIGHT FREAKING THERE in the pages of the Old Testament.

Nexto is the fact that indeed it IS the Old Testament, or the ‘Torah’ as the Jews like to call it in lisping/spitting/neurosis-laden language, that is the beating heart of this entire apocalyptic disaster.

Again, we are forced to point this fact out, somewhere between the millionth and billionth time, due to the distressing/depressing number of people who incessantly chirp like mindless birds that it is not the Old Testament (Torah) that is driving all of this apocalyptic business, but rather the Talmud.

And, finalmente, please note how the OBVIOUS moral contradictions inherent in her Judaism that pit the violent and vindictive commandments as SHE HERSELF describes them in complete opposition to the universalist virtues of compassion, mercy and justice are not enough to liberate her from the intoxicating, addictive and soul-destroying precepts of her Torah, showing once again the wisdom inherent in the old adage that you might be able to take the Jew out of his/her sin-a-gogue, but you can’t take the sin-a-gogue out of the Jew.

Haviva Ner-David for the Times of Israel

As a Torah-practicing Jew I moved to Israel out of Zionist ideology. Growing up, I went to Zionist schools and summer camps, where I imbibed the narrative that after 2,000 years of exile and oppression, even genocide, we, the few, defeated the many evil nations who were out to destroy us, and created a third Jewish sovereignty here on this land promised to us by God.

But once living on this land, I slowly began to open my eyes, ears and heart, and realized I had only been told part of the story. After hearing stories of Palestinian suffering, I began to form close friendships with Palestinians and began looking beneath the surface of what I had been taught. I did my own research and listened to my friends’ family stories, and I began to get a broader picture.

When I read this week’s Torah portion, Ekev, I hear echoes of the Zionist narrative of my upbringing. Moses tells the Israelites as they are about to cross the Jordan River into Canaan:

If you shall diligently keep all these commandments which I command you then will God drive out all these nations from before you, and you shall possess greater nations and mightier than yourselves. Every place where the sole of your foot shall tread shall be yours; from the wilderness to the Lebanon, from the river, the River of Perat, to the uttermost sea, shall be your border. There shall no man be able to stand against you. (Deut. 10:22-24)

Moreover, we are told:

You shall destroy and consume all of the peoples which YaHWeH your God shall deliver to you. Your eyes shall not have pity on them, and you shall not worship their gods. For that will be a snare for you. (Deut. 7:15)

As I read this week’s Torah portion, I want to close the book in dismay. If this is what my most sacred religious text tells me, then this religion is not for me. But then another verse in this week’s Torah portion catches my eye: “And love the stranger because you were strangers in Egypt.” (Deut. 9:19). I grasp onto this lone voice of collective memory that is not about vengeance but rather love and compassion.

These are the two voices I heard inside my head as missiles were falling on us weeks ago, and much of the world did seem to have turned against Israel and the Jews. There is an enemy who wants to wipe us out. There is antisemitism. There is an anti-Israel bias. Our collective trauma is not unfounded. How easy it would be to turn to this week’s Torah portion for justification to close the heart I worked hard to open.

But how can I love the stranger if my heart is hardened? If I cannot have compassion for the stranger, how can I love her?

In this same Torah portion, we are told to love not only the stranger but to love God — with all of our hearts and all of our souls. (Deut. 9:12) How can I love this vengeful God with my heart when my heart is a compassionate heart? How can I love this jealous, power-hungry God with my soul when my soul is an expansive universalist soul? Does having no pity align with what we today call “Jewish values?” Perhaps it does for some, but for this human with this heart and this soul, it does not.

I am reminded of the powerful documentary film “Blue Box,” directed by Michal Weits, great-granddaughter of Yosef Weitz, the mastermind of the Zionist plan to create a Jewish majority in a sovereign Jewish state. The Jews were a minority on this land before 1948, which is why they were happy to accept the Partition Plan.

When the surrounding Arab countries attacked, this was a license to change those demographics. When the Arabs left in fear, their villages were razed and they were not allowed to return.

According to the many diaries that Yosef Weitz left behind, he carried out this plan with a heavy heart, as he did feel compassion for the Arab refugees he was creating, but he felt at the time that it was “us or them.” He assumed the surrounding Arab countries would absorb the Palestinians, whereas Jewish refugees had nowhere else to go.

But the Palestinian refugees were not absorbed, and he had a change of heart, especially in 1967, when occupying the West Bank and Gaza Strip reversed much of what he had accomplished. With annexation, Palestinians would again be a majority on this land. With occupation, Jews would be mistreating the stranger. At that point in history, the Jews were no longer the powerless refugees they were in 1948. But matters were out of his hands.

This week’s Torah portion tears me apart — if we are truly meant to read it as a recipe for how to live today. But what if we aren’t? What if we are meant to read it as a recipe of what not to do today? What if instead of trying to repeat history, we are meant to correct it? The Jews were sovereign on this land twice already, and it did not end well.

Should we insist on the borders God promised us in Deut. 10:23, or should we take the spiral path forward, look beyond Deuteronomy, inward to our “hearts of flesh” (Ezekiel 36:29), and find a new way to live here in this land that does not pit “us” against “them”? I am part of a growing movement in Israel to create a shared society, a true partnership of equals. It is hard work, but it is the only way to spiral out of this vicious cycle dating back to the biblical Ishmael and Isaac.

%d bloggers like this: