Orthodox Man Jailed for 14 Yrs for Raping Ex-wife

Orthodox man jailed for 14 years for raping ex-wife

 The Jewish Chronicle reports the case of a “strictly Orthodox” Jew (which I take to mean one of the religious Jews who are ipso facto innocent, unlike the “leftist anti-zionists”) who was, from what I understand, raked through the coals of the Goy justice system for a transgression that should have been dealt with only by his community.

 Here is the JC report, with my commentaries and clarifications in square brackets in italics

A strictly Orthodox man found guilty of the kidnap, rape and false imprisonment of his ex-wife has been jailed for 14 years.

The man, in his sixties, showed no emotion as Judge Nigel Peters passed sentence at Snaresbrook Crown Court on Monday. [Why should he show emotion in front of these Goyim? He answers to a Higher Authority.]

In addition to two 14-year sentences for two counts of rape, he was sentenced to seven years for kidnap and false imprisonment. The sentences will run concurrently.

[The article does not mention if his ex-wife was really properly “ex”: did she get a “git” or not? If she did not, then to my mind the religious man still had his rights over her. But that’s me.]

Asking the judge to apply the strictest sentencing guidelines, prosecutor Charlotte Newell said the offences showed a significant degree of planning, and an abuse of power over the woman.

The rape victim, she said, was “particularly vulnerable due to the nature of her relationship with the defendant and the cultural restrictions within which they operated”.

[Just what did this Goy prosecutor mean by “cultural restrictions”? It sounds to me like a snide anti-semitic remark implying that Judaism makes a woman more vulnerable!]

Defending barrister Jonathan Goldberg told the judge his client may have acted in the heat of the moment following a discussion with his ex-wife about the paternity of two of their children.“A husband discovering one and possibly two of his beloved children are or may not be his is grave provocation and mitigation and explains this extraordinary behaviour on the day in question,” he said.

[This was a poor defense. With a very small effort he could have produced psychiatrists to testify that when a man — much more so an Orthodox Jew living under the divine decree “Multiply!—finds out that the children he had with his wife may not be his, his natural reaction is to rape her in order to make some of his own.]

The defence barrister also invited the judge to consider the effect of the man spending time on remand, where, according to Mr Goldberg, as a Charedi Jew he had been mocked and jeered at for his appearance by eastern European and Muslim prisoners.

[That was not bad but is still weak. How about the Holocaust?!?]

In passing sentence, Judge Peters told the man: “You have planned and committed an act of great degradation and great cruelty in locking up your ex-wife, having tied her down and raped her.”Judge Peters said the man had lured his wife to his warehouse under the pretext of looking after his granddaughter, before spraying her with mace, tying her up, and bundling her into what was described as a “dungeon.”

[Dungeon, shmungeon! These are details designed to make the impressionable Goyim weep. You want suffering? Why not ask the man about his relatives who perished in the Holocaust and how that knowledge affected him?]

“There was no excuse or reason you could properly give, as to why you didn’t cut the ties that were holding her down. You left the premises to get back to a young child and to cook your son a meal very shortly before [the start of a religious] festival and you left her there in darkness in the lower part of the safe room tied up,” he said.

[Duh! If he had not tied her she would her run away. Commendable that he observed the religious holidays in the midst of his great exertions to acquire progeny.]

DI Neil Rawlinson of the Metropolitan Police’s sexual offences, exploitation and child abuse command, said: “This verdict marks a momentous milestone for all victims of rape. It is important to note that the victim in this case was fully engaged throughout the police investigation but at the point of the trial, felt unable to attend. Due to the overwhelming evidence gathered by my officers, which supported all aspects of the victims account, the CPS agreed to proceed with the trial without the victim – a first of its kind for rape. My officers worked tirelessly with forensic experts to gather and present the best evidence possible, with their tenacity being reflected in this outstanding outcome at court.

[Missing is the explanation of why she did not attend. She may well have regretted bringing such tsures on the head of a man who was once her husband and shaming the Community in front of Goyim.]

It is sad to see this obviously deeply religious man brought to such a shameful and excessive castigation. With apologies to Yeats’ “Leda and the Swan,” it is mind-blogging to contemplate that the “shudder in the loin engendered there” the prison wall, and the watch tower for 14 years.

If Pollard could get his life term reduced to 30 years, perhaps this man will get his term reduced as well.

One question: It sounds like he would be at risk among non-Jews inmates, so why not set up a separate Prison for Jews Only. It would only serve kosher meals and it could have, just like in real life, separate sections by social class: say, embezzlers, stock manipulators, insider traders and generally higher-class Jews at the top of the penitentiary comfort level, apart from the “general population” of rapists, pedophiles, gropers and voyeurs. There are categories – like organ traffickers— that could fit in either of the two tiers, depending, I suppose, on the volume of their business. But that may well apply to pedophiles like Jeffery Epstein as well, whom I don’t see placed in the “general population” section. Just a suggestion.