[Ariadna: I dearly hope this is all insidious, vicious, lying propaganda designed to discredit Russia, and that in fact Russia continues to stand firm, shoulder to shoulder with Iran, on the non-negotiable position that only the Syrian people are entitled to decide who should lead them. I realize that Russia must do what best suits its interests but I cannot conceive of any inducement Kerry is presenting to Lavrov (including the lifting of sanctions) that would offset the losses incurred by Russia if it abandons Syria to the clutches of the anglo-zionists and its Arab client states. Not only would it lose its Mediterranean basis in Syria in short order, but also its international prestige, so well earned so far. As for the sanctions, they can always be reinstated, in part or in toto, on any pretext.
I hope this is a lie. There is only one state the US cares about far more than even about itself, and that is Israel. With the rest of the world the US plays with a deck of marked cards. If Syria goes, Russia loses big and its grand performance so far will have been an empty show of braggadocio. If Syria goes, through Russia’s abandonment, Iran will remain alone.
Aside from this being a lie, the only other possibility that comes to mind is that Putin, like so many times before, is making a move the mentally laggard anglo-zionists have not deciphered yet and will take them by surprise, an unwelcome surprise. If so, let’s hope he is not too clever for his own good.]
Putin meet w Kerry to show that they have proof of what the USA and the Zionists are doing in Syria. This was NOT reported in the news.
Putin told Kerry to stop the shit in Syria or they will expose this to the world w proof. Kerry and The Jew Polish witch had to eat crow. Look at her face she was crapping her pants.
The real story was Putin has proof.
Don’t believe it ….Putin cannot let Assad go.
It would ruin his credibility.
I wish he would, Tapp! I wish he would expose them!
UN and Reuters sources for this story?
Really?
Last time I checked Reuters was Rothchild owned and
the UN legitimizes Israeli international crimes.
Sabba posted a story today that states quite the opposite.
With all the spades that Russia has in its hand now, this
story is not convincing at all ariad.
Na. Makes no practical sense for Putin to take the soveirgn
choice from the Syrian people.
Especially since Russia and Syria are backed by their own
peoples will and international law.
What would a move like that say to his own and Syrian people?
Sell that crap somewhere else please.
More information warfare. But for whose consumption is the lie? That’s the real question.
It is propaganda. Reuters has been doing it for decades.
Reuters is owned by Rothschilds. Can you trust any info sources coming from that criminal Jewish cabal? By the way, this article gave completely opposite info than Sabba’s posting: “Complete Humiliation: Assad Can Stay, Kerry Concedes After Meeting With Putin”.
Which posts gave correct info? Experience tells me, when we read and hear any info coming from the sources of the self-claimed Chosen, the Master of Lies, the Master of Deceptions, we always have to use our discernments.
I read the article at the link.
Look at the very numerous names of contributors at the end, meaning that a committee came up with the ‘news’, that the Russians are saying that Assad would have to go.
Assad is Syria.
Were he to go, George Soros would instantly install several democracy movements across the country, and who would violently vye with one another, and the intended bedlam would result in a failed Syrian State, as Soros would want Israel next door to be the beneficiary by exploiting the permanent shambles.
All that work put in by Russia since 30/9, in methodically destroying ISIS will have been for nothing, since one of the conditions to be observed by Russia will be that they withdraw all their forces because the person who had invited them in, Assad, will have departed.
Thank you, Tapp, Dante, Todd, NLG and Chris. They never tell the truth, that’s established. It’s once in a while when they wrap their lie around a kernel of real news, even that distorted, that for a moment they manage to scare.
@truth4ever99: The comparison between the two reports is a case study of HOW the lie is manufactured. If the truth is that Kerry (US) was forced to retract the previous demand for Assad to step down, the lying report will misstate facts and claim that it was Putin who was forced to retract his previous support for Assad and the propaganda report will claim that Russia has agreed that Assad can stay ONLY through the transition period, after which he must go.
This propaganda strategy makes the public wonder: is it possible that we just don’t know the whole deal, all the terms of the agreement? That the sentence “Assad can stay” also contained a clause specifying the duration? This is a more perverse kind of lie than the simple process of reversing the picture whereby white is black and vice versa.
When I read the article earlier this morning, it immediately seemed apparent to me that this was deceptive ‘spin’ on an (alleged) statement of Putin. I don’t believe Putin’s actual statement was quoted for one thing; and those reporting on the (alleged) statement are anonymous.
The statement supposedly is that Putin would HAVE NO OBJECTION to Assad “stepping down”. The ‘spin’ we’re supposed to put on this is that Putin now INSISTS that Assad MUST step down. There’s quite a difference between the two, isn’t there?
As I understand it, Putin’s position all along has been that it’s not up to any outside forces to determine whether or not Assad continues as Syrian President. It’s totally up to Assad and the Syrian people. That is not at all inconsistent with the (alleged) statement that Putin would HAVE NO OBJECTION if Assad (voluntarily) steps down. But so far as I can see, there is still no indication that Putin has come to agree with the Zionists (Jewish and others) that Assad must be COMPELLED to resign or else forcibly “taken out”. In other words, Putin would also HAVE NO OBJECTION if Assad does NOT step down! Let Assad and the Syrian voters decide the question.
Great discussion by all!