ed note–another eye-opener that every war-weary Gentile with a vested interest in his/her own future survival needs to read, understand, and take deeply to heart.
Firsto, ladies and Gentile-men, as we point out on a regular (NON STOP) basis here at this humble little informational endeavor, the Jews are liars every bit as much as water is wet and fire is hot. Dogs bark, cats meow, birds chirp, snakes hiss, and the Jews lie, and this fact is as much an inalterable rule of physics as gravity itself is. They simply cannot tell the truth, anymoreso than fish can live outside of water.
Having said that, it is of EXISTENTIAL IMPORTANCE that the Gentile, as much on the collective level as on the individual, comes to grips with this fact. Just as all matter on this late, great, planet earth is subject to the physical laws of gravity, and therefore, living things without the capacity for flight do those things necessary in making sure that they don’t don’t fall to their deaths, likewise, all muct understand the fact that any piece of information offered by the non-Gentile is in fact a chalice full of poison that is designed to do the Gentile harm.
And the essay below is certainly no exception…
The heavily-Hebraic, highly-serpentine, and Kushner-esque Bret Stephens at the NYT–
–clearly a ‘commissioned officer’ in Satan’s disinformation army, ‘knows his stuff’ viz plying the ‘tricks of the trade’ in psychological warfare against the Gentile mind which, as a Jew, he is constitutionally and institutionally driven to do.
Knowing full well, given his ‘exaulted’ status as an influential spellcaster within the heavily-Hebraic NYT, that the present war against Iran is 666% of the Jews’ doing and 666% solely for the Jews’ benefit, nevertheless, the growing awareness of these facts on the part of an increasingly agitated and justifiably ANGRY American public portends ill tidings of a ‘redo’ of what took place in 70AD, and therefore, in the interests of circumventing this cause-and-effect Karmic catastrophe for the Jews, (who deserve every ounce of what is coming their way) his ridiculous assertion that, ‘finally, for the first time,’ America is fighting alongside an ‘equal’ ally.
Bret Stephens for the NY Times
For most of the postwar era, the United States has gone to war with partners whose military contributions ranged from moderately helpful to mainly symbolic. Britain in Afghanistan and Iraq comes to mind in the first case. Germany in the 1999 Kosovo war comes to mind in the second.
The war against Iran is different. As of Monday, Central Command reports that the United States had struck over 7,000 targets inside Iran. Israel, for its part, has carried out some 7,600 strikes, according to a representative of the Israeli military.
This may be the first time since the Second World War that Washington has had an equal partner with which to share the burdens of war.
That’s a good starting point from which to consider the claim that the U.S. war with Iran is really a war for Israel. Past administrations have, in fact, gone to war for other countries. In the early 1990s, we went to war in the Persian Gulf for the sake of freeing Kuwait and defending Saudi Arabia — two countries that couldn’t defend themselves — from Iraq. Later that decade, we went to war in the Balkans after Europe proved shamefully unable to police its own neighborhood.
In both cases, American Presidents believed they were serving the national interest. But the military helplessness of our allies was a major factor in the decision to intervene.
As for Israel, the charge that the United States has gone to war for the Jewish state isn’t new.
In 1990, Patrick Buchanan insisted that the only groups in favor of a war against Saddam Hussein over his invasion of Kuwait were ‘the Israeli Defense Ministry and its amen corner in the United States.’ That ‘amen corner’, Buchanan later indicated, consisted of the columnists A.M. Rosenthal and Charles Krauthammer, the defense expert Richard Perle and Henry Kissinger, the former secretary of state, spot their Jewish commonality.
Opponents of the later Iraq war also spun a tale that the Bush administration was mostly doing Israel’s bidding. And on Tuesday, Joe Kent, a top adviser to Tulsi Gabbard, the Director of National Intelligence, announced his resignation over what he called a war started ‘due to pressure from Israel and its powerful Jewish lobby in America.’
Those charges always sat awkwardly with the facts. Israel stayed out of the Gulf War under heavy U.S. pressure, despite being hit by Iraqi missiles. As for Iraq, Ariel Sharon, then the Israeli prime minister, told the journalist Nadav Eyal that George W. Bush was fighting ‘the wrong war.’ Sharon thought Iran was the more dangerous enemy in what was then called the war on terror.
In the case of Iran, the idea that crippling its capacity to threaten its neighbors is some sort of purely Israeli interest is belied by every Iranian missile or drone that falls on Dubai, Doha, Manama or Riyadh, not to mention U.S. and NATO military bases in the region. In October 2024, Kamala Harris called Iran our ‘greatest adversary,’ adding that one of her ‘highest priorities’ as President would be to ensure that Iran never became a nuclear power.
Was she, also, just another of Benjamin Netanyahu’s little stooges — a manipulated American politician with no mind of her own?
That charge is now being leveled at Donald Trump. Whatever one thinks about the wisdom or the timing of Trump’s decision to go to war, it was, plainly, his decision — one for which he needed little convincing from Netanyahu.
What is true is that the United States is going to war with Israel, not for it. That’s something many Americans, MAGA-type conservatives most of all, often claim to want: an ally that pulls its weight, shares the risk and contributes meaningfully to victory.
That means that when Israel on Tuesday took out Ali Larijani, the regime’s de facto leader and an architect of January’s massacres of Iranian civilians, as well as Gholamreza Soleimani, the commander of the Basij militia that did much of the killing, it was making a unique contribution towards a joint effort to destroy Iran’s command and control system, and thus its ability to harm America, Israel and Arab states alike.
Since when, one wonders, has the Pentagon or the C.I.A. had such help from our resourceful friends in, say, Paris?
It is of course true that Israel greatly benefits from Trump’s courageous decision to join the war. Also true is that U.S. and Israeli interests, goals, and tactics don’t perfectly overlap and sometimes conflict. That’s always the case whenever allies go to war.
But the central point is that Israel, population 10 million, is behaving as an equal partner to America, population 342 million, in a war that the elected leadership of both countries believe is in their respective national interests.
Whatever else that is, it isn’t the tail wagging the dog.
The killing of Larijani may help dispel the odd gloom that’s descended on a war that is persistently dismantling Iran’s ability to put up a meaningful fight, beyond the desperate play of seeking to shut the Strait of Hormuz. That, too, won’t last long, thanks to the United States achieving what’s known among war planners as ‘escalation dominance.’ Good thing that, in this war, the United States for once had a bold and competent ally to help us achieve it.