For many Jews, the Torah’s authority does not derive from being a divine document.

ed note–Our apologies ahead of time for the reader being forced to wade through what is the typically verbose and circular jabber-jawing that attends virtually any and all Judaic wordplay, but there are important ‘protocols’ to be learned here.

First, as we point out here often, contradictory to what is casually and irresponsibly passed around as ‘fact’ these days by various ‘experts’ who claim that the Torah (Old Testament) plays no part in modern-day Judaism or in the thought patterns and behavior of its adherents, this is simply not the case at all, and all anyone need do in proving this fact for him/her self is to read what it is that the Jews themselves write and say on a daily basis.

Those who DO make this claim do so for emotional reasons rooted in their own personal brand of religionism and are loathe to admit to themselves that in truth, as much as they may claim to be opposed to the Jews and to the power structure the Jews have created for themselves, that at the same time, as ‘Judeo-Christians’ they believe in and practice the religion of those whom they claim are their own enemies. Of these, obviously the most unhinged and irrational are followers of Christian Identity, who adhere to the Old Testament as if it were a winning lottery ticket and who believe that as white people, they are the ‘real Jews’ and that today’s Jews are imposters.

The other thing very important and revealing in this piece is the manner by which many Jews admit that they don’t believe in the ‘divine’ origin of the Torah, but adhere to it anyway, and for easy-to-understand reasons once a RATIONAL person understands exactly what the Torah is–A contract between Jews (and Jews only) that if they adhere to the ‘protocols’ contained within this document, it will result in the creation of a highly-organized ‘members only’ society that enriches and empowers its acolytes similar in many respects to those fraternities and groups such as those involved in Freemasonry, Scientology, etc.

My Jewish Learning DOT com

The traditional Jewish position is that the Torah is all divine in origin. Yet nowhere does the broader Bible suggest that it was all written by God and in no way is this belief necessary to live as an observant Jew. The Jewish Bible, the Tanach, attributes authorship of some of its sections to God, but these are few and far between.

Let’s start with the second part of the Jewish canon, the Prophets (Nevi’im). The early prophets — the Books of Joshua, Judges, Samuel, and Kings — claim to tell the history of Israel from the time of the conquest of the land after the Exodus through the destruction of the First Temple in 586 BCE. Nothing in the style of these books suggests that they are divine in origin. Though in places they certainly talk about God (in the third person), they present many different perspectives on this era and share all the pitfalls of humanly written histories.

Some of the later prophets — Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel and the twelve minor prophets — explicitly claim to reflect divine revelation. The second verse of the Book of Jeremiah states that “the word of the LORD came to him [Jeremiah] in the days of [King] Josiah …” In case this is not definitive enough, the first real prophecy in the book opens: “The word of the LORD came to me.” (Jeremiah 1:4) Several other prophetic books contain similar claims, though not all. Isaiah simply begins: “The prophecies of Isaiah son of Amoz, who prophesied concerning Judah and Jerusalem in the reigns of…” (Isaiah 1:1). The book makes no explicit assertion of divine origin, though this was surely assumed by his audience.

Most of the books of the Writings (Ketuvim), the third section of the Tanach, completely lack the suggestion that they are from God. Psalms is a book of prayers to God, not from God (though some early Jews considered it divinely inspired). In most of the Book of Job, God is spoken of in the third person. Proverbs is mostly human wisdom. The five Megillot (scrolls) also lack any suggestion of divine authorship. Song of Songs, for example, is explicitly attributed to Solomon, with no hint of divine inspiration. Only some sections of Daniel contain prophecies attributed to God—though unlike earlier prophecy, these are mediated by an angel.

In sum, much less than half of the Prophets and the Writings contain any internal suggestion that it originated from God. Much of later Jewish tradition assumes that these books may have a divine hand behind them —whatever that might mean. But this idea developed only in the post-biblical period.

Even the Torah itself – the first five books of the Bible—nowhere suggests that it is all divinely authored. Only in Exodus, the Bible’s second book, does the ubiquitous formula “The Lord spoke to Moses saying” begin. Absolutely nothing in Genesis suggests that it was originally understood as given from God. The first words of the Bible are, “When God began to create heaven and earth” — not “God said to Moses, ‘When I began to create heaven and earth.’” The final book of the Torah, Deuteronomy, presents itself as Moses’s speech, not God’s.

And yet, the traditional Jewish position is that it is all divine in origin. This position is taken for granted in rabbinic literature, but is already suggested by some late biblical books that call it “the Lord’s Torah,” “the Torah of Moses,” or even “the Lord’s Torah given by Moses” (2 Chronicles 34:14).

The classical formulation of the divine origin of the Torah comes from Maimonides: “The eighth fundamental principle is that the Torah came from God. We are to believe that the whole Torah was given us through Moses our Teacher entirely from God … through Moses who acted like a secretary taking dictation….” (For a longer version of my claims here, see the second chapter of “The Bible and the Believer: How to Read the Bible Critically and Religiously.”) This assertion has some roots in earlier rabbinic literature and, as noted above, in the very latest books of the Bible. But its status as dogma is debated, and is connected to the fraught issue of whether Judaism is just a religion of deeds or also has central creeds like Christianity.

Even so, Maimonides’s position concerns the Torah only—not the entire Bible, and as noted above, goes beyond the explicit claims of the Torah concerning its authorship.

Modern biblical scholarship even casts doubt on the divine authorship of the sections of the Torah which explicitly claim to have come from God, including those that follow the formula “The Lord spoke to Moses.” The Torah contains too many contradictions to all be seen as divine. Do servants get released after six years, as stated Exodus, or at the Jubilee year (once every fifty years), as noted in Leviticus? Which divine speech is the correct one?

Biblical scholars have shown that the Torah contains too many contradictions and infelicities to be divine, and it instead came into being over a very long period of time, reflecting the understanding of various ancient Israelites, living in different places at different times, of what God wanted of them.  But a text that reflects people’s understanding of God is quite different from a text dictated by God to Moses and preserved without error for three millennia — the view of Maimonides and a position upheld by many Jews within the Orthodox community.

Should this matter? Does scripture need to be perfect in order to retain its scriptural status?

For many Jews, the Bible does not get its power, or even its authority, from being a divine document. When reciting the initial blessings before reading from the Torah, we laud it as Torat emet— a Torah of truth. That need not mean that it is entirely true, but only that it contains profound truths. Sometimes these truths are close to the surface. Other times they are brought out through interpretation — even radical interpretation that fundamentally changes the original meaning of the text.

Truths can be found in many places, but as Jews it is our obligation to search out and to follow the truths we find in the Torah—to make the Torah, indeed the whole Tanach, into our central orienting text. The Jewish community has created the books of the Bible and placed them — most especially the Torah — as the central compass of Jewish life.

Being Jewish means adopting this Bible-centric position — buying into the Torah and using sections of it (along with other wise texts from other traditions) as a guide for our lives and to create continuity with our ancestors — even if we are not following the Bible as God’s revealed truth.

4 thoughts on “Did God Write the Torah — and Does it Matter?”
  1. john 8:44

    You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.

    and the author of Torah
    lest we forget.

    so what is there to even discuss.
    when j-w says, g-d, he means -evil, as per k-l nidre.
    anti-god created anti-humans who speak anti-language, so everything they say means the polar opposite, EVERYTHING, so let’s stop being surprised like morons who step on the same rake 5x daily going to and coming out of washroom.

  2. The traditional Jewish position is that the Torah is all divine in origin. Yet nowhere does the broader Bible suggest that it was all written by God and in no way is this belief necessary to live as an observant Jew. The Jewish Bible, the Tanach, attributes authorship of some of its sections to God, but these are few and far between.

    That’s one of the most disgusting things I’ve ever read and that’s saying something. Read this over and over and let it sink in. Marinate yourself with it. Soak it up.

  3. —“For many Jews, the Bible does not get its power, or even its authority, from being a divine document. When reciting the initial blessings before reading from the Torah, we laud it as Torat emet— a Torah of truth. That need not mean that it is entirely true, but only that it contains profound truths. Sometimes these truths are close to the surface. Other times they are brought out through interpretation — even radical interpretation that fundamentally changes the original meaning of the text.”

    So, from WHERE does the “Torah” receive its “authority”? It “truth(s)” are “brought out through interpretation – even radical interpretation that fundamentally changes the original meaning of the text” then it’s obvious no unwavering “truth” exists and certainly none that applies universally and under all circumstances.

    How can “continuity’ with Jewish ancestors exist if the text can be interpreted to ‘fundamentally’ change the original meaning of the text? Not that I think there is much discontinuity between what the Torah states and what Jews have done until now. These non-sequiturs are meant to cause gentiles to waste time attempting to reconcile ideas that cannot be reconciled.

    It reminds me of Benny the Ratzinger’s lies about the so-called “hermenutic of continuity” in trying to claim that Vatican II was not a rupture with the 1900 year old magisterium of the Catholic Church.

    Yes, the time may be approaching where more Christians will start to ponder the reasons why the Catholic wagon was hitched to the Jewish donkey. Did the early church fathers think they were eternally punishing the pharisees by combining the ‘law’ of Moses to the love of Jesus Christ?

    Regarding the New Testament: One can imagine the ferocious spontaneous combustion if a Jew were forced to read aloud the text of the Sermon on the Mount (the “Beatitudes”). http://www.drbo.org/chapter/47005.htm

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Discover more from The Ugly Truth

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading